It shorten concentration time significantly, promote false narrative who is successful and who is not and promotes pseudo science
37 karma · joined May 5, 2026
It shorten concentration time significantly, promote false narrative who is successful and who is not and promotes pseudo science
His skin was falling from body while he was still breathing
2. Chernobyl nuclear plant was very poor copy of safe by design nuclear plant. It had critical flaw in carbon based proton catching mechanism
3. Closed zone is currently habitable (except Sarcophagus area). You'll receive much higher radiation dose simply by flying to Norway. Nature is returning there, there're plans to repopulate it
4. This was in Soviet Union and power plant was "public". Most of the power plant in EU is public if not every single one. I don't have exact information on this topic
Please do not treat entire technology, which is safe, as a threat simply because some greedy, uneducated people from the past wanted better position and paid ultimate price for it
I don't know why you think it's only usable but this is your right.
This one file was more sophisticated than any other file in the project.
It contained "good practices", editors/IDE files of applications dead for more than 10y, personal. /tmp directories in various names, files versioning using suffixes and comments for sections v of rules starting about in half of the file.
This project learned my to keep your own shit in local global gitignore not in project.
Keep your 500€, your fellow citizens in average need it more than average European
I self-host my application so I don't have need for such service but if I couldn't I would pay 9€
Even today Claude was not able to dig deep and try other ways to do what it suppose to do for me. It was constantly "I gave up"
And now your comparison is inaccurate. I said whole application. So the correct one would be selling/renting construction vehicles vs building entire building and here selling/renting is maybe 10% of developer income.
Digging a hole is like making small code change and if you wish to continue using this analogy then tokens are digging a hole and selling entire applications (thing Software house do) is construction company building entire building
Second obviously deliver more cash and here AI premise starts to crack. AI can't deliver anything good, costs much more than developing team (Uber proved it) and even if you use it as hard as possible and it does what it suppose to deliver max 5% increase across the board
I have stupid question here. Why they sell tokens instead of AI generated full application and AI fixes to your code without you needing a single dev?
I manage to create functionally correct application but it fall very short in performance and required constant logic validation. GUI components also required constant oversight and manual fixing since AI was simply unable to fix it and gone in circles doing exactly the same thing 2 steps back. Sometimes it even broke perfectly correct component for no apparent reason
Lastly it tends to load data from server in very suboptimal way, ex. for each comment it loaded user profile often repeating request.
After a week I had GUI app which lacks in UI and no-one would use.
The same application to develop manually would take considerable longer but application would be useable and fixing above issues most likely would take longer due to accumulated tech debt
The issue lies in willingness to upgrade and cutting costs on end users
In Poland we informally use combinations and maybe some Poles use letter per key but I my entire live I never met a single person to do so
We don't need to reinvent the wheel and create completely new OS