6 karma · joined August 9, 2018
Contact: first last 77 at the google email service
As for how to find/approach such companies, that's a tougher question. It's a great boon for a company to be able to get Orphan Drug designation[3][4], for which KS may qualify. Hurdles are lower and it can help them bring that treatment to approval.
One thought would be to examine company pipelines for drugs targeting this gene/pathway, even if it's for a different condition. For example, here's a press release[5] on a company with preclinical results for Sickle Cell Disease on a EHMT1 inhibitor (probably not what you need but at least related) and here's another[6] on a CDMO contracting to produce GLP protein for a client (it doesn't say who but at least indicates interest).
Another thought would be to look for companies targeting related conditions because at least they have the expertise and may even have a candidate (failed or active!) that could provide some benefit. The idea of a repurposed drug search is a good one if you can find something still under patent since you'll need someone with deep pockets to reach approval.
Note that these might not be pharmaceutical companies but biotechs instead, the distinction being small-molecule (chemical) vs. large-molecule (biologic), respectively, as it's much more difficult for others to make a generic copy of the latter. To that end, you might add monoclonal antibodies to your list of potential modalities.
Sorry, I have no clue on the funding question. You mentioned several other foundations that had success; I'd suggest reaching out to them for ideas and strategy if you haven't already. I do know that some states have Life Science initiatives of various kinds which might offer grants/funding and may have associated incubators and whatnot where smaller players can "band together" to get shared access to equipment, lab space, expertise, etc. Unfortunately I don't have a link for that at hand but can try to dig up something if it's useful.
[1] https://www.forbes.com/2010/02/19/expensive-drugs-cost-busin... [2] https://healthcareglobal.com/top10/top-10-most-expensive-dru... [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphan_Drug_Act_of_1983 [4] https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/01/17/5095068... [5] https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/12/11/125070... [6] https://www.contractpharma.com/contents/view_breaking-news/2...
Location: Tokyo Japan
Remote: Yes, or onsite for the right opportunity
Willing to relocate: Yes, for the right opportunity [US only]
Technologies: What do you need? Most of my heavy work is on a Java stack, but I've written major components in R, Python, Perl, whatever it takes. I do lots of data wrangling in R, bash, etc.
Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-eby-620794
Email: contact me through LinkedIn or restlessmech [at] gmail [dot] com
An alternative Python compiler by itself frankly buys us very little. Perhaps Jython, if it weren't targeting 2.7.x.
I've been following Graal for quite some time, both as a former PLDI guy but also for my day job. I work in bioinformatics software (mostly cancer genomics research) and our group has a ton of (mostly legacy) code in Java and R, but most of the newly-minted grads coming in lean towards Python.
As one of the guys pulling all this stuff together, the Graal "polyglot" multilingual VM concept is of tremendous interest as you can imagine. It would be great to be able to package the legacy stuff interoperably with the new stuff no matter the language, even setting aside the bonus of better performance. But it has basically no practical use to us without Python (+ packages!) due to the direction and language inclinations of the group.
Is there anything new happening on that front? Or anything we could do to help it along? Is there more a detailed status page anywhere? Any sense of when this might land in a truly usable form, or what's the hold up?
I'm a bit surprised that the progress with R (with packages) is so far along but the progress with Python (with packages) seems stagnant (at least according to that README). No offense meant to the team, but that's the appearance. Is it the GIL?
[1] https://github.com/graalvm/graalpython, which calls it "early-stage experimental" and "very likely that any Python program that requires any packages at all will hit something unsupported".