6,142 karma · joined July 22, 2020
__ _____ ____
/---__ ( (O)|/(O) )
\\\\/ \___/U\___/
L\ ||
\\ ____|||_____
\\|==|[]__/==|\-|
\|* |||||\==|/-|
____| *|[][]-- |_
||EEE|__EEEE_[]_|EE\
||EEE|=O O|=|EEE|
\LEEE| \|EEE| __))
```
Hi! I graduated college and now have a job doing computery stuff (.NET! AWS! Buzzword-of-the-week!)I'm always interested in cool stuff! e-mail me at easton (at) planeteaston.com
(formerly jedieaston)
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jedieaston; my proof: https://keybase.io/jedieaston/sigs/lu5huw0A68urY5ftOa-yQJE5LMbuOYjoIzW1862Z2N8 ]
(But still good.)
I don’t understand how you’d domain join otherwise.
It definitely works.
which is equally funny I think
Which is extremely dumb, but when the alternatives are “10x capacity just for stupid bots” or “hire a guy whose job it is to block LLMs”… maybe that’s cheapest? Yes, it sucks for the open web, but if it’s your livelihood I probably would consider it.
(Either that or make following robots.txt a legal requirement, but that feels also like stifling hobbyists that just want to scrape a page)
I'm going to write a script that keeps trying to call ecs:MakeFargateCacheImages.
But you needed a private entitlement for it to work that no app (save UTM after a jailbreak) had, so the pet theory at the time was internal Apple engineers were running around with Linux on their iPads.
(And it’s free, if you don’t mind the mild lock-in).
Probably a cleaner way, but it’s just a exe, so replace it like a exe?
I seem to recall the network activation server for Windows let you activate unlimited clients on a key, although maybe I'm misremembering, or the person who configured it did something funny.
---
[1]: Does Microsoft even do first party license audits anymore? I'd imagine with so much of the licensing being a part of cloud spend that they don't care since you're already paying $20+ per month per head anyway for windows and office.
My mom told me about a time they had someone with that situation at work, and people would call the person FNU until they were corrected.
var y = x with { things I want to change }
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-ref...I suppose the lesson is to not publicize your bucket names, if possible? Or if not, leave them present but empty in AWS and don't actually delete the buckets?
It all kinda changed when interfaces had to be big enough to differentiate between buttons with your finger instead of a mouse.
Feels like low risk unless the watch gets out of sync (but easy enough to change the code to stop the watch from showing old data if that happens).
(Something the UI reminds you of if you’re on a business plan without it, if you click the button it offers to request a license from your admin unless they remembered to turn that off.)
The silly part of me wants to say they picked USDS because it had a D in it, but I’m guessing that wasn’t it.
“ESTABLISHING AND IMPLEMENTING THE PRESIDENT’S “DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY””