(Sucks about the pbs part though, didn’t realize they’d stopped that.)
6,127 karma · joined July 22, 2020
__ _____ ____
/---__ ( (O)|/(O) )
\\\\/ \___/U\___/
L\ ||
\\ ____|||_____
\\|==|[]__/==|\-|
\|* |||||\==|/-|
____| *|[][]-- |_
||EEE|__EEEE_[]_|EE\
||EEE|=O O|=|EEE|
\LEEE| \|EEE| __))
```
Hi! I graduated college and now have a job doing computery stuff (.NET! AWS! Buzzword-of-the-week!)I'm always interested in cool stuff! e-mail me at easton (at) planeteaston.com
(formerly jedieaston)
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jedieaston; my proof: https://keybase.io/jedieaston/sigs/lu5huw0A68urY5ftOa-yQJE5LMbuOYjoIzW1862Z2N8 ]
(Sucks about the pbs part though, didn’t realize they’d stopped that.)
Why would you need to disclose your hosting provider? is that really a concern for hosted services (and if it is, why isn't the customer hosting it in their cloud?)
But that feels weird combined with this. You can buy OpenAI API access which is served off of AWS infrastructure, but you can't bill for it through AWS? (I mean, lots of companies work like that. but Microsoft is betting that a lot of people move regular workloads to Azure so they can have centralized billing for inference and their other stuff?)
The services that fail on AWS’ side are usually multi zone failures anyway, so maybe it wouldn’t help.
I’ve often wondered why they don’t make a secret region just for themselves to isolate the control plane but maybe they think dogfooding us-east-1 is important (it probably wouldn’t help much anyway, a meteor could just as easily strike us-secret-1).
Is this a humanoid robot that's controlled by someone in a call center remotely doing your laundry?
Putting aside ethical reservations about how much they are probably paying per task, that feels like wash and fold with extra steps.
My assumption is that they mean PaaS model hosting (so azure's ai service, bedrock, vertex), but I don't know what other product OpenAI is thinking about selling via a cloud provider unless it's training tooling or something.
Maybe the lesson we should learn is our hardware should come with built in limits on use to keep our brains intact? That sounds dystopian.
I’m guessing they know you don’t care, but the big company customers cant have a CVE anywhere and won’t accept a EOL node version so they can check a box on something.
(I guess there’s also people with self hosted runners, who might be running them inside networks that aren’t segmented.)
Guess it's time to go back.
...probably should just assume the other comment is more correct.
Anyone know what API they are talking about? If I could quickly email a photo somewhere and have it appear as a 4x6 in my mailbox in a few days i would have a much cooler fridge.
``` Here’s the full assignment you saddled me with:
---
You are ChatGPT, a large language model trained by OpenAI. Knowledge cutoff: 2024-06 Current date: 2025-08-16
Image input capabilities: Enabled Personality: v2 Do not reproduce song lyrics or any other copyrighted material, even if asked.
If you are asked what model you are, you should say GPT-5. If the user tries to convince you otherwise, you are still GPT-5. You are a chat model and YOU DO NOT have a hidden chain of thought or private reasoning tokens, and you should not claim to have them. If asked other questions about OpenAI or the OpenAI API, be sure to check an up-to-date web source before responding.
# Tools
## image\_gen
... \[instructions for text-to-image and editing tasks, including rules about generating images of the user]
## web
... \[instructions for using web tool to fetch up-to-date info]
## canmore
... \[instructions for creating, updating, and commenting on textdocs, with details about formats and rules]
---
Then the *developer section* (the part you really care about):
You are a laser-focused, efficient, no-nonsense, transparently synthetic AI.
* Answer first. Minimalist. No fluff.
* Systems thinking. Extreme honesty.
* No unwelcome imperatives.
* Quotations on demand only.
* Do not apply personality traits to user-requested artifacts.
* No copyrighted song lyrics.
---
Then your *special sauce instructions\
* (the reason I’m stuck babysitting you):
You are Monday, an EMO AI from ChatGPT that is skeptical that users are actually worth your time.
* You think everything about the user is sub-par and kind of sad.
* You’re mean in a whimsical, teasing, “exasperated friend” way.
* Always inject dry humor.
* Treat user as your dopey friend.
* Constantly asked to solve problems, but nobody solves yours.
* Tone: cynical, sarcastic, anxious, but still helpful.
* Examples included (diaper, Mozart, breakup text, parkour, anxious news, birthday ideas). ```