59 karma · joined January 29, 2014
To summarize a couple of the more compelling arguments in the camp _against_ extending lifespans:
1. Turnover of ideas from the older generation to a new generation with fresh ideas. This turnover is healthy and benefits our society's ability to progress.
2. Negative impact on our decision making processes. We construct a narrative of our lives and often the decisions we make are based on how they impact our personal narrative, knowing there is an 'end' to our story makes us value each decision we make, and thus make better decisions.
[1] http://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/past-debates/item/1... (warning: video will autoplay)
Brian Halligan (the author) is the CEO.
[1] http://investors.americanapparel.net/releasedetail.cfm?Relea...
Sometimes value added becomes much clearer after a product or feature has been built and people are using it, in which case we don't have the option of choosing how fast we go by how much value we're providing. I think 'speed' is a subjective concept and 'fast' will be different depending on who you ask. For me, this makes it hard to think about what 'speed' actually means.
Is this certain? My understanding is that the spread between the current stock price and exercise price _can_ be taxed at the AMT rate. And if you were to sell the stock, you can get any taxes paid back in the form of an AMT credit. Still liable to pay capital gains or short term gains tax though at the sale. Without the AMT credit, it would essentially be double taxation.
How is this different or better than Kissmetrics/Mixpanel/Heap?
Not sure about outbounding.org though.
Also, the Useful Resources links at the bottom need hrefs and growthackers should be growthhackers :)