1,596 karma · joined March 26, 2013
Those are important qualities for food, no need to disregard it as spin.
Devil's advocate, is that actually a good thing?
Might be good for the consumer but not great for the laborer. Working for someone else is a bummer. Increasing consolidation means increasingly more of us will be in that position.
JavaScript would like a word with you.
I'm surprised to read this, Erlang and Rust have almost nothing in common. It's understandable that BEAM doesn't suit your needs but suggesting that everyone should write Rust instead is grossly misleading. They are suited to solving different problems!
I agree, as an optimist I believe that consuming inorganic compounds is by default healthy!
More seriously, I believe we should be very concerned about chemicals with unknown biological effects entering our food supply.
That said, I haven't seriously tried programming using variable width fonts; maybe it's a well-kept secret to digesting code. Or maybe it's like Hemp Milk, there's a reason it hasn't caught on.
Given that, why should it be okay to hack Fortnite, but hacking Netflix or Spotify would be considered criminal behavior?
Hacking software and hacking an online service are not equivalent activities.
This isn't a good analogy. Creating and distributing cheats ruins the play experience for everyone. Making paper boats doesn't detract from anyone else's enjoyment of reading a book.
How is this appealing?
He probably would if they were someone else's cows.
To be more accurate it was a series of Tweets, each expanding the narrative and doubling down on the original statement:
- "Shareholders could either to sell at 420 or hold shares & go private"
- "My hope is all current investors remain with Tesla even if we’re private. Would create special purpose fund enabling anyone to stay with Tesla. Already do this with Fidelity’s SpaceX investment."
- "Def no forced sales. Hope all shareholders remain. Will be way smoother & less disruptive as a private company. Ends negative propaganda from shorts."
- "Investor support is confirmed. Only reason why this is not certain is that it’s contingent on a shareholder vote."
Sure it can; at a minimum all functions consume compute resources. A tiny change in a "pure" JavaScript function could lead to cascading deoptimizations that destroys performance and compromises service availability. For example, changing 0.0 to 0 could do it.
I've received numerous "new" items that were previously opened and returned merchandise; things like a vacuum with hairs in one of the cleaning attachments. Same with a pair of headphones. I'd be happy if there were a discount for accepting a minimally used item. As it is Amazon just hopes you don't notice.
Looks like the US is the largest trading partner with China, how much leverage do you need? How long would it take a "unified bloc" to agree on doing anything?