I would have said that make it much more resilient, but I have seen so many buses that couldn't accept fares... I'm not so sure if it's the case.
1,704 karma · joined April 4, 2013
I would have said that make it much more resilient, but I have seen so many buses that couldn't accept fares... I'm not so sure if it's the case.
Because he does provide the email and the leak name... He even provide indirectly where to download it from his blogpost.
Providing the website won't give more dangerous information, that's exactly what he usually does when it's not a stuffing list, he say where the password come from (Linkedin, Facebook, etc...).
You write this as if that mattered...
Should he only works on stuff that gets more download? For what reasons? He works on what he wants to works on, it's amazing and he is lucky to be able to do it.
> The move that Sindre (and others like wooorm) made has not been well-received
It's normal to be sad to have lost someone that was working on something you needed, but anything else is just entitlement.
Don't know for your provider, but on Gmail, I click on Spam and there are all there. It's not censorship, it's sorting. I usually go see them once a month, just in case something got badly sorted (it's also quite entertaining to see the scams attempts).
In what world is it censorship to choose to read something or not too? It may be censorship for sure that something is blocked (and still can be argued upon), but choosing not to read crap is not censorship, just like choosing not to read every scientific papers in the world is not censorship…
This on the other hand is quick, can be done away from the meter, away from cameras, and can reach many meter at the same time. Considering the few terrorist acts that have been done to electricity distributions points, it does seems like a good ways for them to do a big impact easily, with the right antenna and amplifier.. you could do quite a bit of damage.
I'm closer to 100k, my SO own a business and make very little money. I rent a 2 bedrooms apartments close to Montreal, I order food regularly, own a Volt and I am currently looking at house 30 minutes away from Montreal. It's much cheaper than elsewhere in Canada though,
[1] https://www.rcgt.com/app/uploads/2023/03/individual_taxation...
That's where they are going. To the place that wanted them in the first place. All theses peoples didn't appear out of thin air (though for sure the amazing pay did pushed some to go to "bootcamp" or whatever, but that's been true for the past decade). It's the normal amount of workers that would have been hired otherwise.
In any other field, sure maybe there could be more workers than demands, but in tech, placement has been good and it won't change in a few years (as it takes a few years of school).
The only thing that may change is the pay expectation of theses workers, as the one that did the laid off are the one that were paying a pretty penny for theses jobs.
That page mention a free tier of up to 250 requests, it only mentions search, and even though we can't see the content easily, Web Archive is saying that page has been there for the past 5 years... so is that really the future price? Or is it for a Search API that has been priced like that for a long time?
There's not much incentive to jack prices up 10x, it's their revenue, by doing so they will probably lose some. There's incentive though to not offer something for free, as this is literally losing you cash. You never know all the facts though, Google Maps did increase the API cost quite a bit, so it can always happen, but when it's free, you do know some of the facts... and it's not in your favor.
So yes, still some risk, but not at all the same amount of risk.
The key is to verify... and that's true for AI and people too, though for sure that's not something people are used to do sadly.
Piracy doesn't help much either as theses translations were never digital in the first place. There's many show from my youth that I can't find with Quebec translation, even some that I can't find in their original language.
If I had the cash and time it's something that I would wish to try, getting the distributions rights of a few of theses old shows. There's no way it would be that expensive (probably take quite a bit of time though) and nostalgia would works quite well I believe to attract enough viewership to support it.
Did he not honor the informal contract? What did he not honor?
If anything, Carl didn't honor the informal contract, he was the one saying Minecraft would promote his work, and no a name in a tiny credit is not doing that... but I'm feeling generous as let's be honest that's a bullshit clause that corporation always try to use that line without meaning much so it's to be expected.
Julian said he was never giving all its rights away. That was part of the informal contract. That's the thing that made him not sign it.
C418 made the music... plenty love it, I don't. Doesn't means it has no value, it has none to me, just like the End Poem has none to you, but yet still some people got a tattoo of it.
You are the only one belittling anyone though, you are belittling what Julian did, saying he deserve less recognition than C418, while Julian just said they got recognition while he didn't (without saying if he deserved it more than them).
Not being in the dataset maybe? There's many artists that hate that you can just write "in the style of" with their name.
So at least, if it does appear that it works with their name, they now either have been paid that amount, or they can sue for that amount of lost revenue. At least not everything would be lost.
I'm not a lawyer though, so really no idea whether this could even be possible as it's seems like currently it's fair use.
> As a large language model trained by OpenAI, I do not have the ability to mimic the writing style of specific individuals
> we'll just accept that this is what computers are capable of doing.
I accepted that on day 1 for Dall-E, and I kind of accepted that for ChatGPT too (but that one is more nuanced as it can do "more" than a task, it's hard to determine its limit obviously).
Doesn't change that this is amazing and I do believe will change the world forever.
And that's not logical? ChatGPT doesn't know what is there, so it answer logically based on what should happens there. Obviously having 2 different answers make it less logical for sure, but I have seen many peoples makes plenty of logic error too in real life.
It's crazy to me that for an AGI to be one, it need to be infallible in logic...
Training the models weren't that expensive either, and that's a one time deal.