53,558 karma · joined January 19, 2012
If you’re running a big task or small, everything scales to the appropriate size, regardless of the hardware sitting on your lap or under your desk.
At least that’s how I think of it.
I’ve never worked anywhere or been interviewed at a place that asked this absurd schedule of their employees.
I’m unsure how many devs and how much gets done with $8m.
Having said that very cool project / nice of those folks to do it.
With google the added question though is, are they losing interest again?
I work remote when and how I want, it's great.
But there's days and even weeks where "I just want to go in" and that's helpful with meetings, work, socialization.
Different people like different modes and even at different times.
It's like they heard of the ICC from a facebook meme and develop policy around that.
But yes online there's a populist panic about it that seems disconnected and completely driving itself without basis in reality... Locally there's folks terribly angry about fairly small data centers and they don't realize how many are around them and they never notice. But they don't want to hear it, if anyone is anything but fervently anti data center then you're Elon's friend or something.
The panic reminds me of how the Great Fear in the French revolution was described folks believed everything was an indicator they were right, and denying it meant you were the bad guy ... and thus more evidence that their fear is true...
Some data centers in my area I would love to live near because on the property they have big green space and wetlands surrounding them.
I figured that had largely vanished for a while now.
I suspect even poor uptime for many services is a cosmetic problem for most users.
Or when it comes back with 50% I know, let's talk about this a bit more maybe I add more context and such.
Granted I don't think LLM word math does anything but mostly just output the numbers that make the word salad so maybe that doesn't exist.
Not me, bummer.
The CEO actually doing it himself is surprising. Lots of executives wouldn’t put themselves out there like that.
The idea of someone having to explain what harassment is occurring is of course unpleasant, but that’s also what makes it an effective method of trying to distract from the topic.
If he was being harassed that’s wrong, but it doesn’t make him immune from questions about other things.
And hey if social media is bad for everyone ... put that on social media companies. Not everyone else.
Stupid cookie banners is my favorite example. I don't need to make a legal agreement with every website... if they wanted websites to not do a bad thing, make them, or a mechanism in browsers or something.
Me having to make a legal agreement with every website is absurd and totally predictable.