I'm not sure I'd call 1.5min processing compared to 3-5 min processing as "interactive".
123 karma · joined October 30, 2022
Except you can overclock v3 :)
Never, for sure.
Every year's cope with systemd.
bind C-a send-prefix- there had been no raidz expansion (but now is, so this point is crossed)
- ZFS degrades read latency with the number of drives in array, while mdraid/lvm scales linearly - this is the price you pay for your checksums
- write-cache options on ZFS are atrotious, ZIL/SLOG are nothing compared to dm_writecache - I can stream 2GB/s full of sync writes until my cache drive is filled up, and it also provides reads to freshly written data, without going to backing pool
So, saying "why not ZFS" or "go buy some SSDs" is not really productive for promoting ZFS - it just underscores that "for ZFS" crowd are zealots.
Problem solved
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/20286
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18814
But that's the whole point of Intel's market segmentation strategy - otherwise their low-tier workstation Xeons would see no market.
That's far from their best novel, but unfortunately most aren't translated into English - there're Polish and sometimes Deutsch translations only :(