2,691 karma · joined June 5, 2011
Working on Manano (https://manano.ai), a way for tradespeople to make quotes and invoices using only WhatsApp.
Mail: ross@duggan.ie
Mastodon: https://mastodon.ie/@duggan Blog: https://duggan.ie
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/duggan; my proof: https://keybase.io/duggan/sigs/Q5NKndkmAPY7z_rr6F5aCCILacMed6RndM3X7OZCpvA ]
The more comfortable people are with tools like DTrace, the better they will be able to write and use software.
(Guest additions was trickier than usual).
https://hostr.co/86EDIcFMF7QH for the lazy ;)
<Insert megalomaniacal moustache twirling here>
Or if you want to do it yourself:
1) brew install qemu # and prepare to wait!
2) qemu-img convert -O raw ubuntu-core-alpha-01.img ubuntu-core-alpha-01.raw
3) VBoxManage convertfromraw ubuntu-core-alpha-01.raw ubuntu-core-alpha-01.vdi
HHVM is really coming along in leaps and bounds - recently with LTS commitments from the development team.
He's pretty insightful when it comes to these sorts of things, the kind of "idea guy" that actually makes an excellent product designer. People want this app.
Thanks for saving me the hassle! (of future conversations about how I should build this, rather than actually building it - procrastination's a killer).
1. 2.7 is a stable target. There will be no further features added to the 2.x series.
2. 2.7 is a known target. Other experiments like PyPy have already tried many paths to improve 2.7, so what doesn't work is reasonably well known.
3. 2.7 is a widely deployed target. This is less important from an "adoption" point of view, more so that there is a lot of software written that targets 2.x, meaning there's more software to test with.
4. Finally, I suspect much of Dropbox's codebase is 2.7[1], and since this is an effort to improve things for Dropbox, it makes sense to spend the initial efforts there :)
[1] checking the version of Python bundled with the Dropbox client confirms that it, at least, is 2.7
/Applications/Dropbox.app/Contents/MacOS/python --version
Python 2.7.3[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travelling_salesman_problem
Their blogging has been interesting since before Intercom was even incorporated (at their consultancy company, Contrast's[1], blog).
They're also a bunch of smart, down to earth people.
Exceptional folks. Congratulations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93European_Union_r...
One of the most interesting features, for me, is that Supervisor has an XML-RPC interface[1], allowing for some creative interaction with supervisor and the processes it manages.
I had added two densities so I could muck around with stuff in Pixelmator and was wondering why everyone had chosen the horrible slender version for body text on various sites, but apparently it just means whatever the system collection provides gets priority (which makes sense).
I mean that in the most genuine way possible - companies are made of people, and people make those choices. Those choices may be "good" or "bad" for the organization.
MIT/BSD give people in those companies the freedom, the respect, to make their own choices, good or bad. That freedom is more free, in spirit, than any of the more restrictive licenses.
There is nobody being bent to your will with GPL; someone who wants to use the code either uses it quietly against the terms of the license, or simply doesn't use it.
Restrictive licenses only close doors, they don't open them.
"Here is my metaphor: your book is a pudding stuffed with apposite observations, many well-conceived. Like excrement, it contains enough undigested nuggets of nutrition to sustain life for some. But it is not a tasty pie: it reeks too much of contempt and of envy."
Take anything anyone claims to tells you about yourself with a grain of salt, of course, but I found it interesting.
It was a super fast, if visually opaque, way of doing the calculations required to facilitate a very complex permission system. I imagine Facebook works in a similar way, if on a somewhat grander scale.