The financial math has to clearly be on the side of it being more profitable to practice proactive security.
826 karma · joined July 3, 2015
The financial math has to clearly be on the side of it being more profitable to practice proactive security.
Basically, it means there doesn't need to be any formal agreement between the broadcaster and the IP owner. If you own a radio station, you can play whatever song you want (provided it doesn't violate things like obscenity rules), and the IP owner can't say boo. The IP owner gets compensation, but they don't get to dictate what radio stations get to play their songs.
For reasons that I'm not even going to attempt to speculate upon, a non-trivial number of young girls really like that stuff. Pretending it's not true, or casting judgement on the morality of this won't change the fact that it's effective. If it helps spark children's creativity, imagination, and passion for building things, then that's great in my book.
Every open workspace should come with a free pair of noise-cancelling headphones.
I knew I could double my salary south of the border, but that hurts.
But thanks to consumer protection laws, if somebody steals money off your credit card, they've stolen the BANK'S money. It's up to the bank to get it back.
Yes. I had nobody to take them with, so alone was my only option.
> weren't you scared of having a bad trip?
Not really. I was aware it was a possibility, but I figured worst case scenario was death. Not exactly a healthy attitude, but my mindset at the time was "if this kills me, at least I will have died trying to get better, instead of suicide".
> how long did the feeling last?
The primary effects, I can't say for sure. I didn't have a phone or watch with me. But it was several hours at least. Took them early afternoon, and the sun was beginning to set when I felt like they had worn off.
The secondary effects lasted at least a year, when I decided to do them again the following summer. I've been doing them once every summer for three years, and I've been able to put my life together. I can't say for sure if it's necessary, but I'd rather not risk going back to the way I was. I've managed to put my life back together. It hasn't been easy, but my career is back on track, I have a great circle of friends, and I've even been able to have some healthy romantic relationships.
That's not how it works with clerics in Saudi. They have official standing with the government, have their own police force with the authority to enforce morality laws (the mutaween), and even get to decide who the next king will be.
Or how about letting him do what he wanted in the first place... stay in England. That country is (in)famous for its boarding schools. If they could afford the 6-figure-invoice to have strangers discipline their children via webcam, they could afford to let Shep stay at a top-quality boarding school in London.
The part that made me laugh the most, however, was that Scott Manley had the top comment (when I looked, anyway).
For those who don't spend their off hours accidentally blowing up green videogame astronauts, or stranding them on distant planets, Scott Manley has the single most extensive tutorial series for Kerbal Space Program.
Ultimately, I had to resort to sending them letters via certified mail.
I was on the fence until I hit that part. The tacit admission that they're holding him responsible for what other people are saying on Twitter is all I need to know. They wanna feel like righteous warriors defeating evil.
Reacting to the Nazis with violence was tried in Germany. And it backfired very badly.
Exactly. Between my freelancing and full-time experience, I've been involved with dozens of teams. Very few of them react well when you question their abilities, no matter how fair and justified the question.
It's like the "McDonald's hamburger is really red meal worm" or "KFC is really genetically engineered boneless chicken monsters" myths.
On the flipside, there's far too many people who do the opposite and ignore what "should be" using "what is" as the excuse.
I didn't get that interpretation at all. The way I understood it, he was saying that there are differences between men and women -- some biological in origin, some social -- and the solution requires we acknowledge these differences instead of pretending they don't exist.