1,457 karma · joined October 28, 2019
First off there is payroll tax.
Then there are sales taxes.
And don't forget property tax.
I am probably forgetting something.
I think you want: the Cartesian product of an infinite number of (potentially infinite) non-empty sets is non-empty.
It's not random.
Those of us with a state tax are familiar with the rules and the rates. Those with a modicum of arithmetic ability have a pretty good idea what the total is coming to.
Not saying "this is better" just that it is not as bad as you apparently think.
China is (at best) a frenemy of the US. Allowing a rival to push propaganda onto your children is foolhardy.
It has nothing to do with whether Chinese propaganda is worse than US propaganda.
I don't have to run the numbers, because I read the article where they did the actual research with real numbers, not your back of the envelope estimating, and they came to the opposite conclusion:
| This leads to our second hypothesis: High interest rates are necessary to recoup the high cost of rewards. However, our analysis shows this is not the case. Rewards expenses are more than fully covered by banks’ interchange income—fees collected from merchants based on purchase volume. On average, interchange income amounts to 1.82 percent of purchase volume, while rewards expenses are 1.57 percent.
Which card is this?
If you read the whole article, you would learn that it is actually coming from you, via the merchant. Which means you are likely paying higher prices. Now you pay the higher prices either way for the most part, so you may as well enjoy the kickback^W rewards.
What am I missing?
(Vested interest as a diabetic myself.)
Many people do, in fact, do this:
https://reason.com/2021/06/11/free-range-kids-second-edition...
That feels wrong. For most households, their biggest investment by far is their house. Few households which do not own a house have any kind of investment.
So if only 35% of all household wealth is in real estate, I would wager you have some outliers skewing the numbers (i.e. billionaires).
(This is not a criticism, just trying to reconcile the numbers)
The desk at my AirBnB doesn't seem to have one.
> They're not gold bars. They're not expensive.
If someone has an alternate solution to owning a printer that works for them, whats it to you? Owning a printer so you can print half of the boarding passes you need every time you fly seems excessive to me
You don't need any paid tools if you don't want them, I used a text editor and the terminal and source control.
I don't understand the hostility toward someone offering a product. It's fine that you don't need it, that doesn't mean someone else won't.
(Username does not check out)
That is not the point.
The point is that an emotional support network will help you in these situations and suggesting that someone build one is not "infantilizing" them but giving them valuable tools.
I could care less if you find one personally valuable or not (I don't have trouble imagining that there are people for which they are not), but I object to your generalizations and implication that men who pursue them are somehow lesser.