Fortunately this is probably just as detectable as the Last-Modified abuse in the post.
2,242 karma · joined October 17, 2012
Website: https://mrosenberg.pub Github: https://github.com/rozbb Keybase: https://keybase.io/mrosenberg Email: michael (@) mrosenberg (.) pub
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/mrosenberg; my proof: https://keybase.io/mrosenberg/sigs/dR6U3ijr9MYZyBe0ueW6L90pU8Adb817jaeWietnOH4 ]
Fortunately this is probably just as detectable as the Last-Modified abuse in the post.
Unfortunately the only way to make your website accessible is to put in the work to make sure it complied with the standards. There’s lots of resources online for this. See [2] as a starting point.
[0] https://adrianroselli.com/2022/09/overlays-underwhelm-at-id2...
[1] https://adrianroselli.com/2022/03/faciliti-will-get-you-sued...
[0] https://e360.yale.edu/features/the-real-price-of-a-chocolate...
[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/10/19/million-c...
A data point: The New York Public Library just did their fourth SVG study group earlier this month. The description was "This group is studying Scalable Vector Graphics, images which can be composed in text editors like Notepad, as a way for Blind and low-vision people to create our own drawings or work with existing images. Feel free to join us if you're interested in drawing with code."
This is not at all how API proposals are handled. There are a lot more (time, financial, logical) barriers to a change like this. See the role of the W3C in this: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/11/manifest-v3-open-web-p...
It's god awful on iOS
> Negative effects are related to the amount consumed with no safe lower limit seen.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_and_health
> Alcohol consumption at any quantity is a risk factor for cancers of the mouth, esophagus, pharynx and larynx.
Very brave, though the author forgets to compare to literally any other numbers. A quick check reveals that Australia slaughtered ~1.5M chickens PER DAY in 2013. Currently it's ~2M per day [0].
So the author argues not to avoid cruelty because it only reduces cruelty by 99.9932%. This is garbage.
[0] https://www.chicken.org.au/facts-and-figures/#Production
Do you want a Zulip where account recovery is impossible by design? Or where conversation history is unavailable to new users [1]? You might say "well let people opt in if they want e2e" but that's not helpful either. If even 1 user in a group is not opted in then the entire group has the same security level.
[0] https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2012/04/05/icloud-w...
[1] This must be the case unless you invent a p2p system for users to bring a new user up to date on the group. And even then people could voluntarily lie about past messages. There are neat ways around all this but the point is that this system is very complicated and doesn't currently exist in practice.
If you wanna see some valid criticisms of the existing PQC schemes, read the mailing lists. They're spicy.
[0] https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography/rou...
Say c is the 65537th power of m. You try a guess m' and find that its 65537th power is c + 10 (mod N). Will you choose your next guess m'' to be greater than m' or less than m'? It could be either.
> The digital images can be converted to binary data and encrypted with Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). However, the high correlation between adjacent pixels may still be kept after encrypting a digital image without considering the property of digital images.
What do you mean by this? It sounds like it’s suggesting that, e.g., the AES-CBC ciphertext of an image has detectable internal correlations. In other words, AES is completely broken as a cipher. Surely I’m misinterpreting the claim here.