1,071 karma · joined April 27, 2016
Progressives are fine as long as they aren't being sold as a lens for all situations. For example a lens that would be good for driving or playing golf (using mostly distance vision) would be terrible for sitting at a desk (using mostly the reading area). Depending on your lifestyle there may or may not be a design available that is less annoying than just changing glasses. Bifocals are even more limited in this respect. This trade-off is not related at all to the issue of adaptation which is something else.
So the first question you have to ask is if having both a distance and reading Rx in the same lens is something that is better for you compared to separate distance and reading glasses. My monitors are at head height so simple reading glasses are the best solution for me when working at my desk. If I wore progressives with this setup I would have to tilt my head back in order to view my monitors through the reading area of the lens which is at the bottom of the lens. If I instead worked on a notebook computer all day, looking down at a screen, then viewing that screen through the reading area of my glasses wouldn't be a problem.
I'm currently wearing a pair of fancy fully personalised progressives that retail for £2000 a pair but I still use some cheapish reading glasses for working at my desk. However to be fair to the progressives I adapted to them just about instantly; the design just wasn't suited for reading for long periods of time.
The adaptation issue is another issue and another thing you should consider. Adaptation refers to the ability to become accustomed to the distortion that often exists at the edges of progressive lenses. They can make you feel a bit dizzy when you first wear them. The general rule of thumb is that if you have a small "add" then it will be easy to adapt to them but if you have a large add it may be difficult.
If your add is small now and don't see the point of progressives but are thinking of trying them later as your near vision deteriorates you may want to consider starting on them early just to make it easier to adapt to them later. Otherwise you might get stuck with bifocals which make you look old.
Anyway if I had to boil that advice down to just a few quick points I'd say:
- If you're planning on using the glasses just for working at a desk then I would just get reading glasses (that also correct your astigmatism).
- For other situations where you need both distance and reading then progressives can be nice.
- If you're not quite sure about progressives but think you'll definitely want them later in life then it is better to start on them now.
- If you're buying online I would only get single vision lenses. To get a nice fit for progressives you need to get a bunch of stuff measured that doesn't get put on your prescription.
I've spent quite a lot of time in Spain and I've never felt that but it's possible that I just didn't notice. The same in Italy although I've only spent 3 or 4 weeks there in total. However it has never occurred to me to think of Paris as unfriendly either which seems to contradict the experience of most other people, so maybe I'm just oblivious to that sort of thing.
32 inch, 4k, 144hz, HDR, HDMI 2.1, About $700. I have one and I'm really happy with it.
Only nuisance is that the nozzles sometimes get a bit clogged up but that’s pretty easily fixed.
Even so I’ll never go back to a normal inkjet ever.
> without any plot fundamentals that felt like a deep betrayal to the universe.
There should be a comma between “fundamentals” and “that”
There are almost no consequences for anyone working at a business that gets it wrong.
The consequences for being a nonce are quite severe so the motivation to get it right will be quite high.
https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Le...
I would be more inclined to call the behaviour brave and desperate rather than smart because it doesn’t always work out well for the birds.
But yes I also remember the days when lots of software just didn’t exist for macOS and I was thankful for a webtech version.
I guess my point is that there is clearly a precedent for success by doing this sort of thing. Unfortunately.
The waiting time on hold seems to have gone up since covid though. The last few times I’ve called the wait has been between 30 minutes and an hour when before covid the wait was normally less than five minutes.
I did once speak to someone that was quite hostile and unhelpful but after I finished the call I immediately called back and the person who picked up the phone was much more helpful.
However whenever I’ve had to call for personal matters it’s been a bit more hit and miss.
In order to give you a quote they will need the weight and dimensions of what you are shipping, the pickup and delivery address, a packing list, and a commercial invoice stating what each item is and what it's worth. You've also got to think about how you will load everything. Your options are lifting by hand, using a forklift, or you'll need a truck that has a tail-lift. If you've got all this information beforehand it will make things easier.
If you're putting thing's in a crate like another poster suggests then you'll have to make sure the crate is heat-treated and has the appropriate stamp on it.
We just shipped something at work from the UK to the West Coast of the USA (sea-freight) and it cost about US$1700. It was a crate of about 1 cubic meter and weight about 350kg. This was door-to-port not door-to-door though.
You make a good point and I'd like to add to it. What is interesting is that all modern phone design grew out of the designs of the original iPhone and all modern laptops grew out of the design of the original Powerbook. If you scroll down on the second link below you'll see that the Powerbook is the first one that looks like a modern laptop.
https://www.cultofmac.com/145083/what-phones-looked-like-bef...
I probably made a mistake by not practising typing much on places like keybr.com and about three months in I was starting to think that I had made a horrible mistake because at that point I was slow at both qwerty and colemak but by six months I was totally happy that I stuck with it.
I didn't struggle much with keybindings but I did end up creating an alias cs='cd'. In terms of using other computers I got a programmable mechanical keyboard or I just hunt and peck in qwerty now.
I’ve bound an AppleScript to f3 that copies a link to the currently selected email in mail.app. Being able to link to mail.app from org is pretty cool. The links still work even if the message gets archived or moved to a different mailbox.
This has allowed me to keep track of everything in org.
However if I’m really busy I just use a sheet of paper and a pen and make a plan for what I want to complete that day.
Or is the bringing something part that contradicts your experience?
In the UK it depends on the background of people, and language would also make a difference.
"Do you all want to grab some dinner" is different to "I'd like to invite you all out to dinner"
>But that's still no expected from the host unless explicitly verbalized with the invitation.
In Europe there would definitely be an expectation that alcohol would be provided (although perhaps not all of the alcohol depending on various factors). It would also be expected that guests bring a bottle of wine or flowers or something to that effect. That small gift should be separate to any alcohol brought for the purposes of consumption on the evening.