178 karma · joined April 5, 2011
Check out my github: https://github.com/danielmiladinov
files=`ls | grep toc && ls | grep pref && ls | grep ack && ls | grep c && ls | grep bib && echo ls | grep index`; gs -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -q -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=SecurityEngineering2ndEd.pdf $files
When you get back, you should have a single file, SecurityEngineering2ndEd.pdf (edit the command to name yours whatever you like)Edit: This assumes you're running a unix variant and have ghostscript (gs) installed
Edit: Use this instead in case toomuchtodo's dropbox link doesn't work for you (like what happened for me: "This account's public links are generating too much traffic and have been temporarily disabled!")
http://www.linux.com/news/software/applications/8229-putting...
How can this volatility then be attributed to Bitcoin, and not the other currencies it is valued in? I freely admit, I'm less than a novice when it comes to ForEx, but a statement like
> "The value of bitcoins, it turns out, is highly sensitive to media coverage," wrote Reuters' influential financial journalist..."
seems to me to be exactly the opposite, i.e. media coverage is causing other currencies to fluctuate and the Bitcoin valuations are just a reflection of this.
Sounds very much like the author is attempting to engage in doublespeak...
For the curious/lazy, the parent comment roughly translates from Bosnian into English: "Why didn't you stay in Sarajevo?" (Sarajevo is the capital of Bosnia)
If you could only read one sentence in TFA, this should be it.
To it, I would also just add: "Instead, show others how you would have them behave by behaving that way yourself."
This.
Sometimes it's really hard to tell when you're shaving a yak instead of fixing broken windows. What are some ways to tell you're doing the wrong one?
"Don't ask the fish about the water," and all that.
Direct links to them for your convenience:
Html transcript here: http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-287.htm
Text transcript here: http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-287.txt
Pdf transcript here: http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-287.pdf [pdf]
Don't let not knowing "simple solutions to simple problems" stop you from completing your next action (fixing the bug, finishing the sprint, launching the MVP, etc.).
Don't let not knowing the fundamentals better stop you from "leveling up", as it were, as a developer.
The whole video, IMHO is worth a watch, but the relevant snippet is here, you can watch from about 15:57 to about 18:20 to get the idea:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MShbP3OpASA#t=15m57s
I especially liked his comment at the end of this section:
"The way people work ... is inherent in our brains ... the whole development process ... works really well ... we used the hierarchy that just worked on its own, and that turns out to be the right hierarchy."
From the first paragraph:
"Fieldrunners is an award-winning tower-defense style game that was originally released for iPhone in 2008. Since then it has been ported to many other platforms. One of the most recent platforms was the Chrome browser in October 2011. One of the challenges of porting Fieldrunners to an HTML5 platform was how to play sound."
If it isn't strategic or core to your business, don't be afraid to consider outsourcing it.
By asking questions, you invite the person to open themselves up within their own assumptions. With the right line of questioning, you can help them see what they've been overlooking. It'll expose the problems with their idea and they'll thank you for leading them to "their own" conclusion, which just happens to agree with yours.
I would also agree with your summary, and add to it the presenters' proposition that improving your relationships with others in the organization will go a long way toward helping both them and you produce better results.
From the podcast episode's description:
The relationship between internal support providers and their customers has to be one of the most frustrating in the corporate world. The provider NEEDS x and y and z before he can solve the customer’s problem. The customer just wants a thing, that does ‘you know’, and just works. Both are hampered by corporate policies and processes.
There are ways of making this relationship go more smoothly. But as an internal support provider you will need to change your perspective in order to make this work. You might find this hard to hear, to take and to make the changes we recommend. We’re dedicating this cast to the Atlanta January 2012 conference attendees who found it hard to hear, but thanked us for telling them anyway. We hope you’ll feel the same way.
It's a great metaphor, and I've heard it before - Dave Thomas gave a presentation on Herding Racehorses, Racing Sheep: http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Developing-Expertise-Dave...
[1]: http://code.google.com/p/reaver-wps/ [2]: https://community.rapid7.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/21...
Edit: Though it's been a while since I read it last, I remember finding it very informative and insightful. I don't think you need to be a psychologist or neuroscience expert to read it and benefit.
[1]: http://www.amazon.com/Emotional-Intelligence-Matter-More-Tha...