Love it or hate it, sql is a standard and there is a ton of knowledge (stackoverflow answers, books, tutorials) and tooling (query builders, orms). This is either hopelessly naive, or hopelessly arrogant.
5 karma · joined May 4, 2020
Love it or hate it, sql is a standard and there is a ton of knowledge (stackoverflow answers, books, tutorials) and tooling (query builders, orms). This is either hopelessly naive, or hopelessly arrogant.
...not going to make it.
I got a phone that is just usb-c. Carrying around the adapter sucks, and Bluetooth is an even bigger pain in the ass.
If you're making something for free or for fun, then let curiosity guide you. Bureaucrats like yourself can comment all you want. I'll be making applications.
Encourage consumption (of old/novelty hardware)
Promise of "productivity" (the holy grail for hn commenters)
A pip on your shoulder for being different/special
Deflect from the hard problems internet addiction and procrastination, to "hey do this instead"
Would you create a new open-source desktop application using gtk4? Would you want to package and maintain systemd/pulse/etc?
Also: why are you responding to all the critical comments in the thread, and writing dismissive replies?
It's stable (unlike gtk), and truly free (unlike qt, which is also a c++ behemoth). It's utterly simple and elegant.
Clientside decorations, ridiculous headerbar, button+hamburger menus, etc, etc. They are trying their absolute hardest to copy Mac os, and making sure everyone's stuff breaks in the meantime.
Me? I'll keep writing tcl/tk applications. It's stable, cross-platform, and did I mention it's stable?
Or, to put it another way, if you are doing open source, why are you so hung up on getting paid for it?
Slot-machine of the internet. rage, outrage, xenophobia, name-calling, name-dropping, celebrity, manufactured 140 chars at a time. It's a culture killer.
I mean, I carry my phone around in my pocket, so I kinda expect at least big Google is watching me. And probably the cell network. And probably the government, passively.
But RITE AID? What the hell, a fucking pharmacy? I mean: the customer is typically just buying whatever their doctor prescribes them. I guess they have aisles of cosmetics and cold medicine and stuff, but still, this seems remarkable for its banality and at the same time invasiveness. It's the worst kind of evil: stupid evil.
If you literally put a massive file on the public internet, what the actual fuck are you complaining about? The quality here is such shit.
Let's snipe at amzn, everyone hates them because they're winning, because of hn readers dependence on AWS to run their shit web apps... It's like: ope! It's been a day since we had a "amzn scammed me" post. Nevermind that the people complaining are either a) too ignorant and footgunned themselves, b) minimizing or lying about their own complicity, or c) outright scammers themselves.
It's like these shit-tier blogs and webdevs, who are tracking every single thing you do on their sites. Are they just incapable of creating? all this tracking...it's anti-creative in the extreme. Mechanical, soulless, lowest common denominator. It's medium.com and web 3.0. Where's the exit bros?
At least google "securing X" before just pumping data in.
If we ask ourselves: were online reviews a good thing? To me clearly no. Authenticity has been the price.
I think the thing to measure is defiance rather than conformity, by the way. Much more interesting.