35 karma · joined June 29, 2017
From your perspective, it means that there is also a need to establish agreements on the levels, depth and ways abstractions in the code are formed. Indeed, I worked with software where the functions and operations weren't implemented in a messy way per sé, but the many levels of indirection, abstraction (and obscurement) made things just really difficult to read and a real tail-chaser when it came to maintenance.
Those levels can also make it much more difficult to understand the flow and the operations that are happening, because in many languages you pass references to data objects, so data gets changed in many ways.
Nice article, puts me into thinking mode again! :)
Their business is make money with their users (or used). We must demand a new way to make money, start to think again that privacy matters. But new generations has been striped of that thought, and it’s hard to change that mind… Let’s continue offering different choices, different and ethical services… Greetings
Someone from the commentor community here should do a historical study on censorship like this (not exactly like this, of course, since the internet didn’t exist) under representative governments. Is it rare or unprecedented for voters to polarize into two tribes that will not communicate without the state falling into civil war? Or is it common and just feels like a coming civil war because we haven’t lived a large enough sample size?
It's enough to drive one paranoid.
Although not the only one, NYC has some of the best universities, many top-tier companies, pools of talented people, and the best cultural amenities. There was no reason to kowtow to a behemoth to come here. NYC is big and innovative, and it will stay big and innovative for the foreseeable future. Tech was here before and will it be here after, without being dominated by a single company.
It just makes programming so much more fun — all the tedium is gone, it feels like every character you write is actually important.
The argument around “someone that doesn’t care about tokens” is weak because that applies to any authenticity solution.
The idea behind the authenticity guarantees would be that every step along the way, you add a record that the object has passed through your step. Otherwise I agree this won’t work.
If someone adds a record, but does fill the bottle with cheaper wine, the first person that catches them will blacklist that actor.