Apple isn't Sony. They make an arm and a leg on their hardware.
When they switched to x86, it didn't take long for them to release Boot Camp, so they could take Windows users' money, too.
202 karma · joined August 23, 2016
When they switched to x86, it didn't take long for them to release Boot Camp, so they could take Windows users' money, too.
You can't. I think that's a large part of why LLMs have caught on much better with programmers: they have ways of making the computer check its own work.
Checking a document is still a laborious manual task. And completely unfulfilling.
Remember that these clubs are mostly small, local businesses. Their owners just don't have the technical sophistication to evaluate software security. Or the clout to demand an audit.
Some governments have given rightsholders the ability to order IPs blocked at short notice, and they've caused a lot of collateral damage, making thousands of unrelated sites unreachable.
I have no idea why people assume immigrants are pro-immigration. They're pro-themselves.
Only if they're racial groups, and you're literally the only one trying to box people up by their skin colour.
The Dutch were happy to do those jobs 50 years ago.
After every single "jobs the natives won't do", there's an unspoken "for the dogshit pay we offer."
We deployed troops to Greenland after his comments. Does that sound unserious to you?
You are if you've got a 401(k), just not voluntarily.
The SpaceX IPO is basically a scam designed to force pension funds to buy in before the stock price falls to where it should be.
You threatened to invade Canada and Greenland.
You surely don't think you're coming back from that?
Probably, but we're gonna have to wait for the courts to weigh in for a definitive answer.
Same with the very popular pay-or-accept-tracking model. An Austrian court found it illegal, but we'll probably have to wait for a case to make it all the way to the ECJ.
But "unlimited liabilities" gives entirely the wrong impression. German courts do not award punitive damages, and fees are generally capped below that amount in dispute.
Jobs didn't see a revenue stream, he cared about being in control of how well his own products worked.
He was never going to allow a third-party SDK to define the user experience, least of all one as bad as Flash.
Because then your UI will work the way users of the platform expect it to.
Is the government going to fund all further development? Hard to imagine investors continuing to throw billions at products they aren't allowed to sell.
The whole point is that these particular defamatory claims weren't made by some third-party, but hallucinated entirely by Google's own AI.
There is no "accurate summary". Just a pack of lies fabricated in-house at Google.
You can't just bypass national courts and go straight to the EU.
> the blanket cynicism for all telemetry here is kinda surprising
Who's providing the telemetry/analytics if not one of same large corporations?
Many devs say they care about user privacy, but very few seem to care enough not to farm surveillance out to a 3rd-party they have no control over.
British aristos tend to be outdoor sorts. Range Rover and a Barbour jacket.
QEII was always in wellies whenever she was off the clock.
He edited his work heavily to achieve just the stream of consciousness feel he wanted.
Once upon a time, shouting "WTF are they thinking?" into the void was kinda understandable, but these days you can literally just ask them by changing a URL. Don't even have to go to a dodgy pub in an iffy part of town.
That said, assuming bad faith is so common these days, many people assume you're lying if your stated motives don't match their preconceptions.
I think that's a good rule of thumb for AI-generated output.
That's exactly what they do. It's 80c/month in Argentina.
Make an exception for owner-occupiers?
Your demands are one thing, your integrity is another.