Seems kinda suspicious to me.
202 karma · joined August 23, 2016
Seems kinda suspicious to me.
A phone company should have no idea what its customers say during calls.
Blogs are public.
We can't see what's in our peripheral vision clearly, so they should be able to get away with most of the FoV being blocky af, shouldn't they?
A 20 KG e-bike can get a person around with 0.3 BHP, so 200 KG and 30 BHP is already pushing the boat out.
But people want another order of magnitude on top of that.
Money, for one thing. Actually building the thing IRL is the expensive bit, but it's effectively free for software. So engineers are incentivised to get things right the first time, and software developers are not. It's much cheaper to skimp on QA, let users find your fuck-ups, and push an update.
FF sync "splits" your password into an encryption key and the service password on the client side. The service never sees the key (or real password).
Bitwarden works in a similar way.
It's not 2003. I don't have a separate bunch of WAP bookmarks for my phone.
And you need to pay Apple for the certificate to sign them. And never piss them off lest they revoke it.
What then should we make of the fact that Google practically ensures that they won't hear about such issues by making it next to impossible to report them?
Essentially, git is designed for the "bazaar" development model, while Fossil is designed for the "cathedral" one, which is what SQLite uses, being developed by just three guys working very closely together.
The DA says, “there’s a million-to-one chance it wasn’t this dude.”
Without any other evidence linking the purported perp to the crime, the reality is that the DNA only shows he’s one of 350 people who could have done it (assuming a population of 350m).
https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2017/10/16/falling-...
The suspect tweeted "I know he has epilepsy" and "I hope he dies."
But sure, a judge and jury could only possibly conjecture about intent…
Not a fan of Pinterest (the company), not one bit.