I'm not sure that's a good way to spend the taxpayer money.
67 karma · joined July 25, 2011
I'm not sure that's a good way to spend the taxpayer money.
It uses a vulnerability in a protocol that's used for network sharing, and that's usually blocked at your router
If there's a larg-ish number of optional fields, but each document has only or a few of them, would it create a sparse table with lots of columns? Did you find any problem in these scenarios?
Probably in a few years, when the hyperloops are ready, owning a car won't be as usual as now, but you'll be able to pick a self driven one paying per mile or a fixed per monthly quota.
Could everybody wiser than me tell me if I should be concerned and the possible implications of these decisions? Should I invest in alternative platforms?
Thad was a tipping point for the web, and the world now is different just because of that.
If you have to choose between power and easiness of development, most people will choose the later, and if I can try a new hardware board that doesn't force me to learn anything new, I'd probably try it.
On top of that, I guess most of the 100.000 users at the government -doctors, teachers, judges, clerks...- have never used a pivot table, and won't get those extra 72 seconds per day. This ain't Henry Ford's factory and there are much bigger externalities to take care of before this kind of imaginary optimizations.