It was Discord's helpdesk software (reported to be Zendesk).
If you have problems with that system, you can log a support ticket with the Discord helpdesk, attaching your ID, and they can override it for you.
2,274 karma · joined May 29, 2019
It was Discord's helpdesk software (reported to be Zendesk).
If you have problems with that system, you can log a support ticket with the Discord helpdesk, attaching your ID, and they can override it for you.
That fixed the actual problem in hardware - the software fix just made things look better.
In the olden days, you'd get a Visa Electron or Solo debit card in the UK if you were under 18 or had a poor credit history.
Visa Electron and Solo were online authorisation-only card brands (also known as "immediate authorisation").
If you didn't have enough money in your account, the transaction would be declined. Visa Electron cards didn't have embossed numbers on the front, so couldn't be used with the old-fashioned card imprinters.
Visa Electron and Solo have been discontinued now, so people with poor credit can get a Visa Debit or MasterCard debit card, but with offline authorisation disabled.
That does mean those cards can't work in some places (e.g. on aeroplanes or trains).
Credit Cards generally always support offline authorisation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_authorisation
In many countries in Europe, offline authorisation is more common. Cards have had a chip as standard for over two decades in European countries, and a PIN is often used for cardholder verification.
Combined, these make the risks of accepting a transaction for a small amount of money offline very low.
The limit of what can be accepted offline is known as a "floor limit" in the UK.
If they have an older PC, then they must have already enjoyed quite some period of the 10-year Windows 10 support lifecycle.
Unless Microsoft were to go to an Apple-esque annual release cycle, regularly dropping support for older hardware, I'm not sure how they could ever manage this.
It very much is them following previous practice.
The UK section seems to have a heavy bias towards news from Scotland.
It looks too simplistic for me to actually use.
There is an ongoing ICO investigation about privacy and handling of children's data under data protection laws, rather than this being related to the Online Safety Act:
https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs...
The ICO has indicated it is planning to give a fine to the owner of Imgur due to breaches of data protection laws.
They would be wrong to, given that it's legal to take photographs or videos in a public place.
There is no expectation of privacy in a public place in the UK.
In the official product information sheets, they state that you should consult with a medical professional before using it during pregnancy.
A competent medical professional will tell you that it's OK to use in most cases.
A product information sheet must be published for each new device, and one of the categories included is how long the device will receive security updates:
e.g. for iPhone 17 Pro:
https://regulatoryinfo.apple.com/cwt/api/ext/file?fileId=ene...
Apple may have done better in the past, but these other manufacturers are making stronger legally binding claims than Apple.
2004: You don't need an iPod that plays videos. 2005: Here's an iPod that plays videos.
I just ran a backup, and it was 850MB. So having my phone upload something of that size every day would be a bit annoying.
Most of the major cloud storage platforms don't offer sync on Android.
It's not really a good fit for how the filesystem is used by Android apps.
I currently only do a Signal backup every few months (when I remember), and manually upload it to OneDrive.
I'm not going to pay for their new service - I already pay for too many storage services.
It's one of the most commonly used medicines in the UK - and certainly the most popular painkiller.
YouGov even did a survey confirming that - https://ygo-assets-websites-editorial-emea.yougov.net/docume...
The safety aspects of it are not something that gets raised in the UK much - other than suicide attempts, which are going to happen no matter what medicine you use.
Probably the biggest risk comes from people not realising that other medicines (e.g. for cold and flu) often include it, so they double up on a dose.
That means that when you restore a backup, the app should be exactly as it was when the backup was taken.
That includes all files stored in the app, accounts remaining logged in, settings exactly as they were.
Some things won't be backed up to save space/time (e.g. if you downloaded a Netflix movie offline, it won't be backed up), but it is almost a perfect replica of how things were before the backup.
Android has support for a similar concept, but apps can opt out.
If the app stores files in a non-standard location, they won't be backed up.
One of the worst parts of setting up a new Pixel device is having to log in to dozens of apps again! It's a pleasant surprise when an app used the backup framework properly.
I have to admit, it's one of the things I do miss from iOS.
~56,000 users spread across the entire world isn't going to move the needle when looking at the sort of statistics in the report.
If they consider Ofcom to have no jurisdiction over them, why not just ignore Ofcom?
Why attempt to sue Ofcom in a court that Ofcom could claim has no jurisdiction over itself?
The government itself has said it doesn't believe VPNs should be outlawed - that's even stated in the article.