From that post: "Shared Swift code: 1.47 million lines (66% of the web app, 34% of the iOS app)"
366 karma · joined March 7, 2009
From that post: "Shared Swift code: 1.47 million lines (66% of the web app, 34% of the iOS app)"
There’s nothing inherently dishonest when a company emphasizes their open source strategy. Open source community building is as much about shipping code as it is leading people, and that requires you to be transparent about your intentions. I’ve interpreted opstrace’s release as just that.
I think the concern about neutral project governance is an important one. It’s early days, but from what I’ve seen it seems clear what is being sold vs what is open today. The fact that the project is released under the Apache v2 license means that folks are able to reuse, distribute, and sell the project as they wish — even fork it if they dislike the direction. That said, if governance is a priority for your use I’d definitely look to project in neutral software foundations like the Apache Software Foundation and CNCF.
> FoundationDB Summit is organized on a single track with plenty of time to meet and learn from early adopters, core developers, and other community members. We're also part of the KubeCon + CloudNativeCon Community Events Day, and will be in the same Washington Convention Center as thousands of other open source engineers that week.
This announcement is via the CNCF blog. FoundationDB.org also published an announcement this morning: https://www.foundationdb.org/blog/announcing-foundationdb-su...
Twitter engineering recently blogged about Aurora with a bit more on its history: https://blog.twitter.com/2015/all-about-apache-aurora, and The New Stack recently published a two-part article on the project: http://thenewstack.io/twitters-aurora-relates-googles-borg-p..., http://thenewstack.io/twitters-aurora-replaces-operating-sys...
(full disclosure, I work at the tweet shop)