HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

dav_Oz

1,108 karma · joined November 21, 2020

submissionscomments
dav_Oz··on Spinoza: Life and Legacy
As a locus for philosophy i.e. asking questions with no possible final answer I find Spinoza a great starting point for (modern western) philosophy.

A distinction needs to be made between his later reception (18th century to now) and his influence during his times in the 17th century. His later reception is much charaterized by talking/writing about his works in terms of influence. As with other works (Newtons's Principia, Kant's Critique or Wittgenstein's Tractatus come to mind) with some inital investment required by the reader very few actually read his works in its whole context; e.g. Nietzsche probably only read an introduction to Spinoza's philosophy by Kuno Fischer [0].

Spinoza's work (especially Ethics) can be seen as systematic dismantlement of the all pervading scholastic thinking of his time which already suffered heavy losses by prominent brilliant minds as Francis Bacon ("Empiricism") or Descartes' ("Rationalism"). Exceptional in the Classics he was casting his radical thinking in Ethics into the form of Euclid's "Elements"; back then - arguably the most accomplished kind of reasoning: strictly deducting from evident truths (axioms). [1]

At the time the impression of someone reading the forbidden "Ethics" must have been something like: throwing a half-assed Cartesian Dualism in its own black hole and emerge with an undeniable singularity, later coined by Raphson as "Pantheism".

This vantage point totally freed from any remnants of scholastic shackles allowed for a livley discourse e.g. the pantheism controversy [2] in Germany about a century later and I guess also a deeper appreciation for Eastern philosophy (see: Schopenhauer).

Its influence on psychoanalysis is not as widely covered, this book I find an accessible introduction to Spinoza in this regard [3].

[0]https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/niet.2012.41....

[1]humanas actiones atque appetitus considerabo perinde ac si quæstio de lineis, planis aut de corporibus esset. ("I will consider human actions and appetites just as if the question were about lines, planes or bodies.") https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/spinoza.ethica3.html

[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism_controversy

[3]https://www.routledge.com/Clinical-Spinoza-Integrating-His-P...

dav_Oz··on Scientists Reconstructed a Pink Floyd Song from Brain Activity
>Algorithms already can construct pretty accurate models of a person’s preferences based on physical activities, including typing search terms or tapping to “like” a photo. While there are high hopes that reconstructing words and music from neural activity could enable applications that promote mental health and social connection, reading and interpreting thoughts is regarded as the next privacy frontier.

Uncannily, this reminds me of a popular German cartoon from 1819 titled "The Thinkers Club" (Der Denker-Club) [0] which had the slogan: How long will be thinking allowed?" (Wie lange möchte uns noch das Denken wohl noch erlaubt bleiben?)

It was meant to satirize the clamp down on liberal and nationalist ideas by restricting the freedom of assembly and press as a way to follow through the European Restauration after the Napoleonic Wars.

In the current asymmetry of giant tech corporations (in bed with government) I find the idea of further breaking any privacy walls whatsoever by trojan horsing it with mental health and social connection and declaring it a new frontier just totally backwards. I think as with liberal and nationalistic ideas back in the day we should value privacy not try just to let it go for ultimately what? Dissolve ourselves into AGI superseding Gaia: Le monde, c'est moi! But maybe I'm the old-fashioned one, here.

[0]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlsbad_Decrees

dav_Oz··on Sam Bankman-Fried is going to jail
I see it as a clever and extreme variation of the same underlying fallacy: a) the favored outcome is slightly more probable (51%) b) the expected value of losing could be expressed as negative infinity

That SBF answered this (rhetorical) question that confidently and quick with not necessarily but what followed was simply something like look on the bright side is effectively imho parroting but at least he handled the verb eloquently. It would certainly take me like 20-30 seconds to process it.

dav_Oz··on Sam Bankman-Fried is going to jail
For anyone wondering about the verb to St. Petersburg paradox:

The game is a simple 50/50 for a win or loss. You begin with one unit (say: $1). Every round you don't lose the stake doubles. The game terminates if you lose. How much should you pay (expected value) to enter such game? Given the bank - offering you the gamble - has infinite resources the expected value is infinite.

Well of course one way [0] (another more nuanced way is to question the simple axiom of maximizing the expected value [1]) to resolve the paradox is to limit the resources realistically, analogous to Martingale [2].

Given the world's GDP at ~ $100 trillion (or about N ~ 46 rounds) the expected value (beginning with $1) would be only about $(N+1)/2 so in this case $23,5.

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Petersburg_paradox#Finite_... [Note: the numerical examples begin with $2]

[1]https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paradox-stpetersburg/

[2]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)

dav_Oz··on The 2002 Überlingen midair collision
>Official guidance from the International Civil Aviation Organization, or ICAO, which signatory nations use to create their own regulations, did not say what to do if TCAS and ATC issued conflicting avoidance instructions. Similarly, European regulations failed to cover this scenario.

Technical in the sense of giving priority one over the other; the priority was clear in the US but at the time not strictly set in Europe or Japan (a near miss happened one year before because of conflicting instructions) and in Russia the opposite (highest priority ATC) was true with TCAS being a new thing obligatory for flights to Europe, of the five crew members only one pilot seemed to be aware that the two TCAS are tightly coordinated (CLIMB/DESCEND) for a last resort, but nobody listened to him.

dav_Oz··on The 2002 Überlingen midair collision
>By the time they gave up on this effort, it was too late to prevent the crash even by breaking the rules.

There was too little time. And I imagine it is hard to be that quick and lucid in breaking the rules of ATC.

Edit: I've looked it up and according to this article [0] there was only an informal agreement between Skyguide and the German counterpart DFS regarding this border region. Since ultimately only Germany is solely responsible for their airspace no such an agreement can exist and therefore the federal government (Bund) is partly to blame for the accident.

Indeed the controllers in Karlsruhe had the obligation to intervene asap even without informing the Swiss counterpart but they were instructed otherwise although there had been no legally binding transfer of the sovereign task ("weil es keine rechtlich verbindliche Übertragung der hoheitlichen Aufgabe gegeben habe"); so this was illegal. In both cases a management issue.

[0]https://www.dw.com/de/deutschland-haftet-f%C3%BCr-fehler-der...

dav_Oz··on The 2002 Überlingen midair collision
While TCAS priority was the technical point of failure, I feel that the transition phase from public to private of the Swiss air traffic control services in 2001 seems to be the greatest disruption of this finely coordinated ATC.

Under the new management of Skyguide which led to the obvious cut in labor cost like reducing the night shift from 3 to 2 controllers. The private company still tolerated the extended break convention during night shift from before but leaving only one person responsible, now. And guess what? Maybe a software update to make some efficiency steps when we are at it. The single one controller was then informed during the update taking place what was still functioning and not which was very little.

>Part way through Nielsen’s shift, a group of technicians arrived to install the update, and he was informed that his work station’s main computer would have to be shut down, causing his displays to operate in fallback mode — a secondary condition in which several features provided by the main computer became unavailable. In fallback mode, the system which automatically correlated an aircraft’s radar return with its filed flight plan would not work, forcing him to enter the information manually, and the Short-Term Conflict Alert light, which illuminates when the system predicts that two planes will pass too close, would be rendered inoperative. But Nielsen had no idea what features would be lost in fallback mode, nor did he have any obvious way of finding out. And as if that wasn’t enough, a few minutes later the technicians informed him that they would also have to disconnect the control center’s direct telephone landline to neighboring centers

For me also surprisingly shocking that back in Karlsruhe multiple (!) controllers had to literally watch the obvious horror unfold while the one controller responsible was not available because of ... maintenance work.

>Heartbreakingly, controllers in neighboring Karlsruhe saw the collision coming, but they did not have the authority to speak to planes in another sector without permission from the responsible controller. The Karlsruhe controllers tried several times to call Nielsen in the minute before the crash, but the landlines were down and they couldn’t get through. By the time they gave up on this effort, it was too late to prevent the crash even by breaking the rules. The controllers were forced to watch, helpless, as the two planes collided and then disappeared from radar, knowing that dozens of people were dying before their eyes, and that there was nothing they could do to save them.

Edit: According to this article [0] and this verdict [1] the controllers in Karlsruhe had the full authority but were illegally instructed otherwise by DFS (German ATC) management which had an informal agreement with Skyguide (Swiss ATC) over this border region.

In the end the heavily traumatized and retired controller Nielsen was brutally stabbed because the modern diffusion of responsibility of companies only operates on the culture of financial compensation and is blissfully ignorant of a desperate man losing his whole family trying to restore his honor. So, no apology before everything is settled accordingly.

[0]https://www.dw.com/de/deutschland-haftet-f%C3%BCr-fehler-der...

[1]https://research.wolterskluwer-online.de/document/2ceee0e8-5...

dav_Oz··on We need scientific dissidents
>a Sean Carroll 4hr rebuttal that there is a problem of physics by not opening up to new ideas

Indeed he likes to indulge in his solos (that's what they are for) but after almost 4 hours of reviewing the status quo[0]; he goes on to accurately describe the problem of actually choosing the set of possible ideas/theories to follow through.

Which basically boils down to who gets the funding (and by extension: tenure) and who not. As a part of that system (he sat on a committee) he seems to be aware of the flaws. Because of the incentive to be "effective" with the funds "popular ideas" (what resonates with the community) with a "high probability" of succeeding get chosen, a negative feedback loop if you will.

Interestingly, he sees that problem quite divorced from today's state of physics itself which is too successful (it's hard to come up with new ideas and with today's instruments (energy levels) very little "new" to find) in describing the physical reality.

My personal take: The "effective"/"pragmatist" mostly American wrap up of two obscure subjects from the Old Continent has hit a wall. With String Theory - once also obscure - being comfortable in the platonic realms (Witten winning the Fields Medal) it's time to wrap it up and be more heterogeneous again let the small science do its brewing.

Yes, at first it will open up the most feared floodgates of crackpottery but after awhile it will subdue and finally slip into obscurity, most will jump the boat to whatever hype is the new hype and the one's left will hopefully have very weird ideas with high rigor devoid of most incentives to cheat/conform for a career; 99,9..% will fail of course but at least they will have a fun ride instead of clinging fiercely onto their careers.

[0]https://youtu.be/MTM-8memDHs?t=14354

dav_Oz··on TSMC, Bosch, Infineon, NXP to jointly build semiconductor fab in Europe
Sorry to hear that. I wasn't trying to downplay the issue, I was just recounting from own experiences just visiting the cities (Leipzig, Dresden) multiple times.

>The city itself and university are super nice though.

Then, I hope this will get more widespread :)

dav_Oz··on TSMC, Bosch, Infineon, NXP to jointly build semiconductor fab in Europe
For those unfamiliar with the region (Saxony, Dresden):

A registered association (e.V. in German) bluntly named "Silicon Saxony e.V." (est. in 2000) with over 450 members headquartered in Dresden pretty much sums up the infrastructure and ambition.[0][1]

As pointed out the process TSMC’s 28/22 nanometer planar CMOS and 16/12 nanometer FinFET process technology (fabrication will begin in 2027) is not "cutting edge" but set to satisfy the (local) demand [2] mostly for the automotive industry. I guess a good conservative foothold given the current economic/geopolitical environment, but it's not like an innovation/investing boom or something.

However from a perspective of a young student, Saxony/Dresden - as for now - is pretty inexpensive as compared to Berlin, Hamburg or Munich and has ample opportunities (TU Dresden, Fraunhofer, MPI, Helmholtz Zentrum ...).

[From personal experience I find the people in Saxony (Leipzig, Dresden) have a more deep-rooted skepticism towards the federal government (or any centralized entity ruling over them) which can lead to a good thing - interesting perspectives/lively discussions or depending on your position less good - leaning more to the political (far) right.]

[0]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_Saxony

[1]https://silicon-saxony.de/

[2]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020%E2%80%932023_global_chi...

dav_Oz··on Electron band structure in germanium, my ass (2000)
I guess this must be from '99. Consequently the author went to get his Masters and PhD in CS.[0]

Having gone through a similar ordeal and frustration at the end of my uni career, in the end I went out with the highest admiration for the experimentalists and their tech staff.

[0]https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~kovar/cv.html

dav_Oz··on A fridge from 70 years ago has better features than the fridge I own now
A quick search would tell you:

>The angle of deflection (theta) is:

theta = (4GM)/(cr^2)

toward the mass M at a distance r from the affected radiation, where G is the universal constant of gravitation and c is the speed of light in vacuum.[0]

The best resolution our eyes can offer is about one arcminute (1/21600 of a turn). Depending on your distance from the object, just plug in some numbers.

Say at the earth-moon distance 384400 km the object must be about 24x the mass of the sun to bend the incoming light at one arcminute (~0,0002909rad).

The sun actually bends light at about 2 arcseconds as seen from Earth; the focal point would be about 542x the distance Sun-Earth. [1]

Alternatively the object of say 1m^3 volume at a distance of 10 meters will bend light by 1 arcminute if it weighs 3.27x10^16 kg, the density of about 1/10th of a neutron star.

To conclude: one will be instantly overwhelmed by the gravitational forces before being able to see an object bend light with one own eyes. That's why this kind of extreme bending/lending is reserved for galaxy clusters.

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_lens#Explanation...

[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_gravitational_lens

dav_Oz··on How to find a street in 2 minutes [video]
Basically, that is the gist of the vid, the rest is more or less common sense, I guess.

A short & catchy variation of "Overpass turbo - a super powerful mining tool for OSM" would be a more appropriate title [0][1]. It exists since 2013 but got a massive boost from the Pokémon Go craze in 2016 [2].

[0]https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_turbo

[1]https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API

[2]https://www.itechpost.com/articles/34612/20160930/pokemon-go...

dav_Oz··on Delts Don’t Lie
As a fun side note regarding rigorous anatomical study:

It was always very clear to me from my basic anatomical knowledge that the "delts" are obviously divided in three section: anterior, middle and posterior.

Very easy to spot on muscular bodies with lower body fat or verifiable through palpation.

So understandably I was pretty shocked to find out that the deltoid actually has 7 (!) distinct segments ... like with all the anatomical details: tendons, insertions and function; not some weird artifact of dissecting the muscles, but real anatomic structures[0].

And thanks to super-physiological levels of steroids and testosterone it is even visually verifiable on extremely low-fat bodybuilders[1], once you know what to search for.

[0]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042752/

[1]https://www.strengthlog.com/lateral-delts-muscles-exercises-...

dav_Oz··on Why Oppenheimer Deserves His Own Movie [video]
In the context of the Bhagavad Gita the quote given by Oppenheimer is actually pretty accurate if you look up the relevant passage in Sanskrit and consider possible translations: Chapter 11, Verse 30-33 [0].

A quick summary of the context in the Bhagavad Gita:

Ajurna, an aristocratic (Pandava Prince) warrior highly skilled in archery - right before engaging in a battle of two armies (two groups of cousins: Kauravas and Pandavas) for the succession of the throne - upon seeing all his close kin arranged in two opposing parties all with their unique skills and feats ready to kill and be killed - the warrior prince falls into a deep emotional turmoil. He begins to talk to his charioteer Krishnu who reveals himself to be an avatar of the deity Vishnu.

This dialogue evolves into a whole contemplation in which a part of the upanishadic cosmic view gets revealed to Arjuna/the reader; somewhat akin in style to the secular western form of Plato's dialogue (in this case the Socratic method is led by "reason" or "logos" not a sophisticated mythology like an avatar of a specific deity).

The dharma in the specific case of Ajurna, is to fulfill his caste duty of Kshatriya [1].

Or from the lens of quantum mechanics and modern history the bomb in some way or another was inevitable.

Its fine-tuned parameters (1) put in the Big Bang, the idea (2) conceived by Szilard [2] and the Anglo-American military apparatus (3) rather than merely convinced in its superiority putting the actual resources/technology into the ultimate pragmatic use [3][4] (first mover & cost/risk-reward ratio).

[0]https://www.holy-bhagavad-gita.org/chapter/11/verse/30

[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kshatriya

[2]https://www.newscientist.com/definition/invention-nuclear-bo...

[3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_nuclear_weapons_program...

[4]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_Heisenberg#Membership_i...

dav_Oz··on The office is a theatre for work (2019)
>The problem we have as a species is that we’ve been so effective at optimisation that we have eliminated the need for anyone to exist. A few farmers can feed the country. A few automated production lines could produce the goods. But then all the other people would starve to death. So we just keep on making jobs to put them in. It gets further and further away from reality the further down the hole we go.

I understand it to be hyperbole but the point that as a rough estimate only at most 1/10th of the available work force is actually "needed" in a developed country to "function" is probably accurate. From a late 19th/early 20th century capitalist pov the optimization point was reached somewhere in the 60s/70s. The problem is we have inherited and institutionalized how to "provide for oneself" from a long gone era.

If the goal was - metaphorically speaking - to reach the West Coast from the East Coast; this kind of capitalism had done a fairly good job until the 70s or so. By no means perfect but at least somewhere in the ballpark of a right trajectory.

Atm however we are past the west coast somewhere at the edge of our outer solar system lost in the Oort cloud. Remarkable engine indeed but way off course. And because it is so confusing out here (e.g. global financial market 10x bigger than world's GDP witnessed by all in 2008) in the vast 2.7 K cold nothingness of uber-optimization, the goal of wealth distribution (participation in the market) to the levels of say the 70s seems futile and utterly romantic - a long forgotten pale blue dot of paradisiacal opportunities. Even if the propulsion system which took us way out here is proof of the exact opposite in principle. Nobody has to starve to death as in "natural law" because of a conceptual eternal idea of how a certain kind of economics which was very successful at some time period (and ultimately had won the Cold War) has to work. But people really indeed do in the millions. It is just a sad state of affairs, still.

... but yet some dream to eventually reach Alpha Centauri with this good old machine: "We are halfway there, look, you can even "see" it." When in reality it would take approx. 1000 generations at the current speed.

dav_Oz··on CPI for all items rises 0.2% in June; shelter up
Here in Europe over the last two years the main contributor for inflation are corporate profits (approx. half of inflation) followed by import prices (one third) and labour cost (one quarter) according to an IMF paper [0] published three weeks ago. A historical turning point so far:

>Compared with historical averages, the rising import prices and profit parts replaced labor cost as the main counterpart to inflation over the past two years.

The paper is optimistic that labor costs will "catch up" as it always reacts more slowly but I honestly don't see much left in terms of negotiation power anymore and I think this new reality is seen as a rare opportunity to be cemented.

[Political dimension: Paradoxically, more votes will the go to (extreme) right wing parties which historically always endorsed "authoritarian corporatism" like in the case of Melloni in Italy, now. A more "socialist"/"solidarity"/"union" push would be understandable instead the sentiment is hijacked in a spectacular fashion by the "right" and the "left" is successfully discredited as upper middle class obsessing over "identity politics" and depicted as exuding an all permeating suspicion of the worker's class/lower classes in being susceptible to subliminal racism.]

[0]https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2023/06/26/europes-inf...

dav_Oz··on My Meeting with David Bohm
In physics ToE ("Theory of Everything") is shorthand for a theoretical framework - mathematically formalized - which unifies all observable fundamental forces in nature (observable universe/s) without contradiction. Depending on your worldview like everything has a material basis, the fundamental "reality" is mathematical ... this would literally translate to mean a ToE.

But even the most materialistic/platonic "fanatics" out there acknowledge the basic limitation from a ultimate theory like this: the emergent properties arising from it could in turn be infinitely complex i.e. not wholly predictable, so what we are left with is describing and taming those to our satisfaction.

This all of course can be construed purely phenomenologically therefore minimizing any metaphysical claims like "underlying reality" and it would amount to the same conclusion. This is how I understand Penrose when he addresses this via Gödel's incompleteness theorems.

In this regard I personally like Feynman's pragmatism the most here by acting as a mediator between theoretical-minded and experimental-minded physiscts: Are you looking for the ultimate laws of physics?" No, I'm not. I'm just looking to find out more about the world and if it turns out there is a simple ultimate law which explains everything, so be it; that would be very nice to discover. If it turns out it's like an onion with millions of layers and we're just sick and tired of looking at the layers, then that's the way it is. ... My interest in science is to simply find out more about the world.

So echoing Bohr's reply to Einstein: "Stop telling God what to do" One could reply to Bohm as well: If it is a process let it be a process, it doesn't have to be fixed as finite or infinite or whatever.

To be fair with Bohm he openly questioned many concepts taken for granted and for the moment tried to deconstruct them in a sincere manner (see: fish tank analogy). In a sense he tried to subject his worldview itself to this flow of procedural thinking. But being basically a lifelong outcast in the physics community I can not help but hear the hurt of rejection and the deep longing for connection to openly and passionately challenge and discuss ideas.[0]

[0]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohm_Dialogue

dav_Oz··on Amazon cancels my account after exposing account lockout for “racist doorbell” [video]
To be fair: I don't know enough about the case to judge but it plays well into OP's cards that Amazon closes his long-standing affiliate account because he allegedly had used relatives and friends to squeeze more money.
dav_Oz··on Amazon cancels my account after exposing account lockout for “racist doorbell” [video]
>Dear Louis Rossmann, our affiliate program is designed to direct positive attention to Amazon. The way you have represented the company in your opinions in how we do business are antithetical to the way we believe we represent ourselves in the world. As a result of this disagreement we will no longer have you as our affiliate. Signed Amazon.

Well, it took some underpaid service worker (doing this repetitive work probably 1000x/day) just 1 sec to click a button to choose from a bunch of generic texts reviewed by a legal team to cancel your affiliate relationship with them and you even "got" it. Very effective. Win/Win.

Maybe in the future Amazon will refine this with their own customized LLMs: legally watertight, some "honesty" fine-tuning and who knows from time to time sprinkled with some limericks just for the creepy giggles ...

And owning to the previous experience with Amazon the way more important point: >Don't try to compete with Amazon [...] they will literally destroy you. The corollary to that: if you decide to do even some penny business with them, you are wholly at their whim.

The machine at work seems to be very trigger happy atm.

dav_Oz··on How the brain processes German and Arabic
German is not a pure SVO language rather it is classified as V2 (verb second language) in main clauses and SOV in subordinate clauses. At least I prefer to look at it in that - admittedly unsatisfactory - descriptive manner.[0][1]

There are some folks (like in Generative Grammar) arguing that it has an underlying SOV layer which makes kind of sense because it gets processed like half of the time essentially like pure SOV languages. But alas sometimes one size doesn't fit all. In English you have to go through the extraordinary effort of a wedding ceremony in order to utter the words in SOV order: "With this ring I thee wed." That is some pure SVO energy right here, only broken by love ;)

[0]https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1057/german-...

[1]https://jakubmarian.com/is-german-an-svo-language/

dav_Oz··on Gamification, life, and the pursuit of a gold badge (2021)
>Schools do a terrible job with their gamification of grades so my GPA and attendance were terrible.

Well, it is simply another skillset since at some point you have to game the teachers setting the grades, which involves other kinds of (meta-)hacks. I remember one student who specifically asked every professor at the start of the semester what he had to do in order to get the best grade and then he meticulously kept track of the "progress", some teachers were very reluctant to do so in "specific" terms but in the end he "gamed" it successfully.

As a fun side note from the Old Continent: There is a kind of "ultimate achievement ring" of academia in Austria which dates at least back to the monarchy times under Ferdinand II and in its secularized form is now called "Promotio sub auspiciis Praesidentis rei publicae" and accordingly specified in Austrian federal law [0][1] which has to be followed by each Uni and kept updated[2].

The gist: perfect scores beginning from "Sekundarstufe II" (~ age 14-15) to the terminal degree "PhD/doctorate" achieved in regular time or better.

A fun side note of the fun side note: In 1910, Erwin Schrödinger who formally passed all the requirements for a "sub auspiciis" didn't get to put on the "ring of honor" because the University of Vienna at the time limited the award to only 3 candidates/year, he would have been the fourth one.

[0]https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&...

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub_auspiciis_Praesidentis#Pro...

[2]https://senat.univie.ac.at/promotion-sub-auspiciis-praesiden...

dav_Oz··on The Cargo Cult of the Ennui Engine
Reading through the text which implicitly and as a perlocutionary/performative act by the author is precisely intended to be not the kind of low-effort content of the evoked 'Ennui Engine', actually strengthens my perception why I would actually feel more enjoyment in the "low effort content":

The relatively long suspense of the "Cargo Cult"-like explanation at the end completely falls short of any built up expectations I had, I wouldn't have noticed a difference in the argument if it would have been left out. Instead it seems to function merely as an ornament to elicit some feeling of superiority in one's insight.

I mean if I am able to "explain" cargo cult to you it would be least expected to be cargo cult'ed by the very thing. The text touches on that briefly but suddenly rejects its humbling implications for all the facets of our life by highlighting one aspect: >its most insidious and impactful manifestations lies in entertainment and how we consume it. Where does this uncanny certainty come from?

Not to end on a negative note: Why not trying to appreciate some low-effort boredom at a time? Not something to be avoided at all cost but as an highly viscous opening space in one's rapidly passing sense of time, being mostly empty ("boring") or worn out of preconceived notions, but yet to be taken roads, train of thoughts or in some very rare cases, I'm told, for inspiration. Some appreciation for boredom goes a long way and makes oneself intrinsically less prone to the trappings of the described engine by just waiting "it" out.

dav_Oz··on The Mao-Kissinger Meeting of 1973
From a European perspective it is really refreshing to see some direct words spoken, here.

Mao questioning the US-allegiance of Western-Europe i.e. 1) the Gaullist approach which was successfully soften by Kissinger through Pompidou and 2) the "Ost-Politik" by Brandt.

On the second point Mao pokes a little bit longer:

>You in the West have always had a policy. The beginning of both World Wars was pushing Germany against Russia.

Kissinger is excellently trying to counter any suspicion by speaking clearly to the point:

>But pushing Russia to attack China is not our policy. Because if a war breaks out in China, the danger to us is as great as a war breaking out in Europe.

But Mao still holds his ground and develops his overplayed suspicion further:

>That’s exactly what I wanted to say. Are you now pushing West Germany to make peace with Russia and then pushing Russia to move eastward? I suspect that the entire West has such a line. Eastward, mainly towards us, and also towards Japan, and partly towards you, in the Pacific and Indian Oceans.

So, that Kissinger has to admit they do not have full control over the current foreign policy of Germany as in France, now, but the i.e. US-army is still very present, to give some hard dealt reassurances at the end.

>Kissinger: We don’t agree with Germany’s policy. We would rather have the opposition party in Germany come to power. The opposition party in Germany doesn’t pursue this policy.

[[Long stretch of text from US side memcon]

Chairman Mao: Yes, that’s our feeling. We are also in favor of the opposition party in Germany.

Dr. Kissinger: They conducted themselves very stupidly.

Chairman Mao: Yes, they were defeated. The whole of Europe is thinking only of peace.

Prime Minister Chou: The illusions of peace created by their leaders.

Dr. Kissinger: Yes, but we will do our best to strengthen European defenses and keep our armies in Europe.

Chairman Mao: That would be very good.

I also very much like the excursion to the German roots of Kissinger and where Mao openly albeit casually talks about Hitler's military strategy in WWII. Kissinger insights that the Germans are/were hopeless romantics and Hitler let his strategy be dictated by artistic intuition are met with Mao indirect dry mentioning of the "Treaty of Versailles" as a great humiliation for Germans; here imho weakly echoing the Opium Wars as a great humiliation for the Chinese by the hands of the then world-power Great Britain. Implying/mildly threatening that humiliation isn't always a good long term strategy in dealing with geopolitical adversaries/problems and can lead to quite dangerous out of control passions.

>Dr. Kissinger: He conducted strategy artistically rather than strategically. He did it by intuition. He had no overall plan.

Chairman Mao: Then why did the German troops heed him so much?

Dr. Kissinger: Probably because the Germans are somewhat romantic people and because he must have had a very strong personality.

Chairman Mao: Mainly because during the First World War the German nation was humiliated.

Dr. Kissinger: Yes, that was a very important factor.

Mao then entertains the half-phantasy how they would cope with the Soviets invading China - with Guerilla tactics utilizing the invasion of the terrain into their advantage - directly admitting how he can clearly see that it could play very well in the hands of the US by weakening the Soviets substantially. Interestingly a similar strategy - to create a 'Vietnam situation' for the Soviets - was deployed 6 years later, elsewhere, namely in the mountainous Afghanistan/Pakistan region through "Operation Cyclone"[0].

>Chairman Mao: If there are Russians going to attack China, I can tell you today that our way of conducting a war will be guerrilla war and protracted war. We will let them go wherever they want. (Prime Minister Chou laughs.) They want to come to the Yellow River tributaries. That would be good, very good. (Laughter.) And if they go further to the Yangtse River tributaries, that would not be bad either.

Dr. Kissinger: But if they use bombs and do not send armies? (Laughter)

Chairman Mao: What should we do? Perhaps you can organize a committee to study the problem. We’ll let them beat us up and they will lose any resources. They say they are socialists. We are also socialists and that will be socialists attacking socialists.

Dr. Kissinger: If they attack China, we would certainly oppose them for our own reasons.

Chairman Mao: But your people are not awakened, and Europe and you would think that it would be a fine thing if it were that the ill water would flow toward China.

Dr. Kissinger: What Europe thinks I am not able to judge. They cannot do anything anyway. They are basically irrelevant. (In the midst of this Chairman Mao toasts Dr. Kissinger and Mr. Lord with tea.) What we think is that if the Soviet Union overruns China, this would dislocate the security of all other countries and will lead to our own isolation.

Chairman Mao: (Laughing) How will that happen? How would that be? Because since in being bogged down in Vietnam you met so many difficulties, do you think they would feel good if they were bogged down in China?

Dr. Kissinger: The Soviet Union?

Miss Tang: The Soviet Union.

Chairman Mao: And then you can let them get bogged down in China, for half a year, or one, or two, or three, or four years. And then you can poke your finger at the Soviet back. And your slogan then will be for peace, that is you must bring down Socialist imperialism for the sake of peace. And perhaps you can begin to help them in doing business, saying whatever you need we will help against China.

Dr. Kissinger: Mr. Chairman, it is really very important that we understand each other’s motives. We will never knowingly cooperate in an attack on China.

Chairman Mao: (Interrupting) No, that’s not so. Your aim in doing that would be to bring the Soviet Union down.

Dr. Kissinger: That’s a very dangerous thing. (Laughter)

[0]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone

dav_Oz··on Notes on Vision Pro
I dig his vision of huge, persistent infospaces after all the "method of loci" [0] is a very effective and well described mnemonic device at least since antiquity.

The basic observation: It takes very little effort and exposure to remember places (spatial information) in contrast to taking in linear heavy processed information from writing and numbers (e.g. "facts").

Combine these two and you have a powerful way navigating through the information space itself.

If you look at it, we are confined to rectangular boxes, fancy interactive books enhanced by moving pictures, audio and some very limited tactile feedback but nevertheless bound by the superstructure of a static tiny detail in our overall spatial awareness.

Of course we are now so used to the endless iterations of rectangular boxes that we are extraordinarily proficient at extracting a lot of richness/information from that: in scrolling, clicking, typing, imagining ... I'm reminded by the scene of "The Matrix" where Cipher let Neo glimpse the Matrix code on his screens: "You get used to it, I don't even see the code. All I see is blond, brunette, redhead."[1]

IIRC once a 50s western movie was shown to a rural "test" public from the Eurasian steppe some of who saw a moving picture for the very first time. The reactions were mostly enthusiastic during slow "panorama shots" but the audience reacted very agitated in "close-ups" or "medium shots" where e.g. in the heat of the action the horse's legs were "cut off".

We take it as given that we learn the language of movies and find them at times 'realistic' and 'immersive' when in fact contrasted to 'reality' itself qbit by qbit they are basically - with some rounding error - as highly processed as books and thereby rely heavily on our imagination filling the gaps.

While we are on the subject of of naïve visions, another area which isn't appreciated enough imho is the immense dexterity of our hands as with "vision processing" the devices themselves are glued on our dexterity of "exact" and "repetitive" moves, there is too little wiggle room for organic experimenting, refining and expression like one would naturally do for a musical instrument.

[0]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_loci

[1]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MvEXkd3O2ow

dav_Oz··on DARPA hacked a science writer’s brain and turned her into a sharpshooter
Thanks for the resource. The list is indeed helpful and a good start if one is able to have enough distance to recognize the distortion.

In my case it was so all encompassing (drowned in the noise) that behavioral therapy just increased my paranoia and made me more unstable. At some point I decided to dig deeper and then it 'clicked' and a overwhelming torrent of emotions got released. I guess everyone's journey is different on that one. Some are more in tune with themselves and just need to establish healthy habits to get back on track, which is already hard enough. Others need to confront whatever they are suppressing with all its built up energy (mostly since childhood) and can only then - after integrating - unlock and access the healthy habits routine otherwise they will be helplessly stuck in undermining themselves.

But I agree not everyone needs to confront their demons - so to speak before trying out straightforward methods from behavioral therapy. If you are open and/or desperate enough, you will know if that is the case, is an organic process, albeit very painful.

dav_Oz··on DARPA hacked a science writer’s brain and turned her into a sharpshooter
>She said that for people who have the angry little angry waspy voices in their head, the particular placement of the electrode that I had for that part of the cortex found great success. She said those people have this overactive angry cortex guy just sitting there. When you apply the electric field, it shuts him right up and those people find that their depressive symptoms are alleviated.

I was thinking of conceptualizing this little angry voice as the guy from the “Inside Out” Disney movie, whose head blows up as a volcano. Those were the sorts of angry little voices that I hear frequently as my background elevator music. I never thought of that as being related to being depressed, but I certainly sometimes have a pretty hard time with that. The experience of having that turned off was really interesting. It made me think about what my inner soundscape is daily, and afterwards I really started investigating how to manage that a little bit more deliberately.

Goudarzi: Did the inner negative voices go away immediately or after the currents were flowing for some time?

Adee: I didn’t really notice it go away initially. It wasn’t dramatic. It’s just that when I looked back, I noticed it. After, when I was sort of going about my day, I felt this very deep sense of calm. And it wasn’t only for the duration of the treatment; it was a very slow come down for about the next three days. I just wasn’t this sort of white-knuckling, anxious person—that was really dramatic.

Actually this is pretty hard to do by yourself most people don't recognize this inner talk as self-talk weighing them down, so they can't get off. It took me really some time (opening up to my early experiences in childhood and fully connecting to them from a child's perspective) to recognize this perfectly camouflaged "personality" inside of me talking down on myself.

Now, it isn't gone like described above with the stimulation (cause it's part of myself) but at least I can engage with the voice, acknowledge it and talk back, before I just felt overrun and assaulted.

dav_Oz··on Scar tissues make relationships wear out (2013)
One thing which is often missing or just left implicit in two-way communication is the self-referential aspect:

How are you talking to yourself?

Most people have a hard time tuning into this part because self-talk usually starts in early childhood and by the time one can be made fully "aware" of it, it has already faded into the normal background noise of being oneself, so it rarely gets openly interrogated. The self-talk doesn't have to be sophisticated, it can just be a constant pink noise of: "This is just dumb." ... "I'm miserable" ... "It's my fault" ... "I'm not worthy of love" ... "I'm disgusted by myself".

And, here, I'm still very polite with the wording.

Of course this inevitably bleeds in how you communicate with other people and especially the people in your life you really care about. If you never cultivated to encourage yourself, be kind, patient and forgiving toward yourself at some point you can't sustain the illusion (e.g. "nicest, loving ... person") and eventually it will leash out.

There is a solipsistic aspect in communication worth exploring: I often find that communicating with one another openly and freely is also making one aware of each other's (hurtful, embarrassing ...) self-talk and can make way for the kind of primordial empathy buried deep in oneself and by extension make it easier to fully connect with the feelings of other people.

dav_Oz··on European Commission Calls for Pirate Site Blocking Around the Globe
I've heard a joke somewhere, I'm paraphrasing: If European taxpayers could directly offer all the lobbyists residing in Brussels double the money for not doing what they are being paid for, now, it would be one of the most profitable things and by far and large the greatest deed for all its citizens.

As it stands now the cost of rigging especially in the EU is extraordinarily cheap and effective.

dav_Oz··on Venus is not Earth’s closest neighbor (2019) [pdf]
Distance: a straight line (i.e. shortest line in Euclidean geometry) between two points - is a one dimensional object/projection. On Earth crust where we evolved as 1 m long objects immersed in 1 atm of mostly nitrogen at around 290 K and at a constant pull at 1 g on a spinning ball at 11.5 µHz ... you get the idea ... a very straightforward concept.

Applying it to dust and gas particles (massive enough for gravity to shape it into a spinning sphere) in a vacuum falling towards (on a stable enough orbit) a gas ball with 99.8% of the total mass in the system, itself in hydrostatic equilibrium with its own gravity pull through nuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium ... Well, we are not used to that kind of motion i.e. geometry on astronomical scales. But once you see what dictates the (near) stable motions of all those tiny particles the solution is simple: in the solar system the sun is nearest to all objects in the system, on average. Whatever is nearest to the Sun is the closest on average to all other elliptical moving objects. From Neptune's perspective Mercury is barely moving and oscillating so fast as to standing still. So, in the case of planets the underlying geometry is moving along (stable) elliptical (i.e. closed path) orbits (approx. Newtonian mechanics), applying our "straight" lines for "distance" is amiss here and can lead to confusion. I personally like to see it more - inspired through e.g. Kepler's imagination[0] - as a geometrical-dynamic system (Kepler orbits) more akin to music.

[0]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonices_Mundi

← PreviousPage 3 of 9Next →