-6 karma · joined March 23, 2018
She may not go in detail about the items aforementioned, but she doesn't even mention once that the technology might have have possible dangers, and that one must exercise caution in its evaluation. The article its all about the potential benefits of the technology, without warning the public about its potential dangers.
She even mentions that "the FDA is so painfully slow, and so indifferent to human suffering. It takes, on average, eight years to get a new drug through clinical trials."
Yeah, those pesky thorough clinical trials, they are a hurdle on the return on investment.
1. There is a problem. 2. Government steps in to fix problem. 3. Government creates two new problems by fixing the first one. 4. Repeat x 2
Just like they liked Obama Neo-lib style, but not Bernies.
Original statement is still correct.
Considered by whom? The funny thing is that there was no non-covid excess mortality in 2020, that stated on 2021, which is the same time the v{censored} started.
> Unvaccinated people are dying at a much higher rate.
Again, where did you see that?
Where did you see that?
That needs the remotion of taxation. I agree.
Is there a conspiracy going on now?
"""
These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!
"""
As you can see on (1), that particular tweet is deleted, it cannot be further reached. Trump goes on with the "stolen election" line, nothing new there, the only new thing is: "Go home"
Wouldn't you like to that message to be transmitted to the Trump supporters at that exact time? Wasn't that precisely the message everyone needed? Who better than Trump to defuse that situation?
Why delete that tweet that day? When it was precisely the tweet that was needed? Can someone explain this?
--------
Maybe that is called freezing the account instead of banning it? IDK.
Why?
That video could have prevented the mob from trespassing the congress building.
If they bet wrong, they will lose, unless the State bails them out.
Don't you think that if the alternative was feasible it would have already been implemented without coercion?