They'll still find this one (it glows, right?), but at least it increases the difficulty a bit.
2,244 karma · joined January 26, 2012
dan@tillberg.us
meet.hn/city/40.1672117,-105.101928/Longmont
They'll still find this one (it glows, right?), but at least it increases the difficulty a bit.
0: https://github.com/dbgsymbol/getsymbol/blob/cb4bdedc1a85c308...
Nowadays I use Syncthing for the same purpose (I learned about Syncthing when I did a Show HN for gut). Dropbox works reasonably well, too.
Months later I read Gavin's post (linked above). I found that post immensely helpful to understand Zig's design around sync/async function colors (thanks Gavin!). Gavin's post helped to illuminate for me that Zig functions do have colors, but that the compiler can infer the color in most usual cases. This is still very exciting!
As I see it, it's not to Zig's detriment whether it "has" function colors or not, I don't really care. I'm really excited about Zig either way. But I personally (coming from a decade+ of JS/Python/Go) found the verbiage I found used to describe Zig's behavior here confusing.
Personally, I certainly don't like this practice as a prospective tenant, but it would nonetheless be tempting to consider using it were I a landlord.
0: https://twitter.com/BillDemirkapi/status/1506123471352438784
Perhaps grandparent's comparison of USDT market cap to the total value of the Financial Services Group stock is peculiar, but let's use correct numbers in the discussion. The grandparent comment refers to USDT market cap, which is ~$80B USD. That's roughly equivalent to PNC Financial Services Group ("PNC" on NYSE) market cap of ~$85B. JPMorgan Chase ("JPM" on NYSE) market cap is ~$450B USD.
Is that "phishing"? Those actions should be secure to perform in a browser. The security model of browsers/computers is such that I don't need to establish authenticity/trust in order to click the link or even download something.
Of course, that security model sometimes has holes, but if for example clicking the link enables an XSS attack, I'd call it (primarily) an XSS attack. Same story if downloading an attachment did much more than just creating a file on disk.
> "You pick a door, say #1, and the host, who knows what’s behind the doors, opens another door, say #3, which has a goat."
That's what the gameshow host did in this one trial, but why do we assume that the host would do the same thing every time? Perhaps the host only tries this other-door-goat diversion tactic when the contestant first selected the door with the car!
I don't know where parent lives in the world, but from my perspective in the United States, I deeply fear that there are many Americans who would support an anti-democratic coup (or mob) in a heartbeat so long as it aligned with enough of their political sentiments.
Edit: maybe parent is a little too-secretly sarcastic, but even so I suspect many others think like this unironically.
GP is trying to survive in the world in which they find themselves. Will sniping some guilt at them summon up some hidden parenting strength?
0: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/6620
As I passed, I learned that the plastic bag was actually a dog that was (for unknown reasons) trying to cross the highway in moderately heavy traffic. It was pure luck on my part that I didn't hit the dog as it ran right behind my vehicle.
Sometimes even humans aren't the best judges in a split second of an object's estimated mass and/or whether it might contain some sort of soul. (I was around 30, and neither my cognition nor vision were noticeably impaired)