457 karma · joined April 15, 2013
I tested eight models from unrelated labs (Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen, Gemma, Kimi, Grok) at default temperature with the prompt "Write a story in 10 sentences." Four converged on a lighthouse keeper; two of those named him Elias. The commonly derived "Elias Thorne" name now appears as the byline on an alt-medicine cancer protocols book ranked #18 in Oncology Nursing on Amazon. If anyone has a larger sample, a counter-result, or a better explanation than mode collapse into a shared training-data basin, I'd love to hear your comments.
That’s not impersonation. That’s Bambu discovering that user agents are not authentication.
Would value feedback, particularly from anyone who's worked on Solid, AT Protocol, Iroh, or the Willow Protocol. The comparison chapter in the spec walks through how this relates to each. Willow in particular has real overlap and I tried to be honest about that.
"You don’t accidentally forget to disclose that your memory is split into two non-unified pools. That’s a deliberate omission of the single most important architectural limitation of the device."
"Read that filename. layer_27_36. That’s not dynamic hot neuron routing, that’s static layer assignment"
oh and i regret all the duping glitches i found and exposed and stuff im sorry
Did you see any of this while you were working there, and did you work on anything to try and combat this? Very curious as to whether this is recognised and active measures are put in place to discourage the behaviour.
- Large open source projects
- MOOCs with many students
(Taken from discussion of this post from yesterday):
Is there ascandal going on here somewhere?