Yes.
1,046 karma · joined August 15, 2021
Yes.
"The radiation portals that were deployed in the aftermath
of 9/11 are essentially fine, except for three problems:
They won't find a nuclear bomb, they won't find highly
enriched uranium, and they won't find a shielded dirty
bomb," says Stephen Flynn, a terrorism expert and
president of the Center for National Policy. "Other than
that, they're great pieces of equipment."
In other words, we only have a "security theater" ability to prevent radiological weapons from entering the border. Like the TSA, this theatrical security creates jobs, consumes tax wealth, and enables politicians to say they took action to address the problem while simultaneously giving them someone to blame when an attack occurs. Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy[1] states that in any bureaucratic organization
there will be two kinds of people:
First, there will be those who are devoted to the goals of the organization.
Examples are dedicated classroom teachers in an educational bureaucracy, many
of the engineers and launch technicians and scientists at NASA, even some
agricultural scientists and advisors in the former Soviet Union collective
farming administration.
Secondly, there will be those dedicated to the organization itself. Examples
are many of the administrators in the education system, many professors of
education, many teachers union officials, much of the NASA headquarters staff,
etc.
The Iron Law states that in every case the second group will gain and keep
control of the organization. It will write the rules, and control promotions
within the organization.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Pournelle#Pournelle's_ir...Source?
> Many have jobs
Source?
> How did you meet? On the street?
Yes, and a few did indeed have cars and sleep in cars.
From the article, "We found evidence for a total of 59 liaisons (mean of 2.4 per film)."
This right here. Nearly all homeless I've worked with were non-neuronormative and/or drug abusers. They're almost never just normal folks who have fallen on hard times. The reason they aren't rooming with a family member or friend is because their behavioral outbursts and/or stealing things to buy drugs has exhausted all the goodwill of those who would help them.
EDIT: You are right, double quotes around "UnsafeVarint" improve the result. Learned something new just now. : )
https://github.com/tensorflow/models/issues/7420
Google's #2 hit for me was blogspam at "bankoftrans [dot] com" that copied the source code for UnsafeVarint in order to game Google search results. (A growing problem others in this discussion have been complaining about.)
So Google isn't stellar for your search, either, though perhaps it was working better for you because you were logged in with your Google Account.
Like I said, I do still use Google via "!g" and "!gi" when DDG's results are garbage, but often in these cases Google's results are also junk.
If logical thinking is, as you say, imperfect, is it possible that your own conclusion that no perfect things exist is itself an imperfect conclusion? If you use this word perfect, you at least have the Idea of Perfect, even if no perfect things exist. This kind of funny talk I'm using about Ideas of perfect things goes back 2400 years to Plato and his Theory of Forms[1]. According to the philosopher-logician A. N. Whitehead:
The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition
is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_formsAnd also noting the prominent codpiece [1] covering Henry's family jewels in said portrait[2].
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-04/documents/gh...
But 10.02 grams doesn't seem like very much, considering livestock methane emissions (like cow farts and burps) were estimated in 2011 to produce 120 trillion grams of methane per year:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/samlemonick/2017/09/29/scientis...
So it certainly is a Big Energy sin, but there are graver stakes (involving gravy and steaks).
The Superpowered Latency Database[1] has many measurements showing just how bad Android latency is. (A select few devices do OK.) Note that Apple latency measurements look pretty good, because Apple uses different strategies to kill WebGL browser games: (1) Make WebGL slow and lacking features; (2) Prevent browser apps from going fullscreen; (3) Don't even let browser games ask if they can use gyro/tilt control, just block this outright because "Privacy". After all, if Epic Games could just put Fortnite inside mobile Safari their case against Apple wouldn't be so desperate. There's a demo version of Minecraft for the browser that I've never seen work on mobile browsers[2].
1. "Things will get better."
2. "I understand your loss."
3. "Here's how we can fix the problem."
Some insight into why can be gained by watching the short video, It's Not About the Nail:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4EDhdAHrOg
In many (but not all) cases, if the grieving are willing to communicate at all, they want their cries of pain heard and listened to. They would rather that you cried with them instead of trying to tell them that there is light at the end of the tunnel or that there is a 'fix' for their 'problem' or that we must accept that life is hard and unfair and suck it up.
https://itdm.com/mozilla-firefox-usage-down-85-but-why-are-e...
Yes, but Hollywood Accounting[1] transforms taxable profits into untaxable expenses. (Search this discussion for 'Hollywood Accounting' for a longer post I made.) A revenue tax is more difficult to game with creative accounting methods.
Hollywood accounting can take several forms. In one form,
a subsidiary is formed to perform a given activity and the
parent entity will extract money out of the film's revenue
in the form of charges for certain "services". For example,
a film studio has a distribution arm as a sub-entity, which
will then charge the studio a "distribution fee" — essentially,
the studio charging itself a sum it has total control over and
hence control the profitability report of a project.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accountingEssentially, Apple USA makes billions selling iPhones in the USA, then pays those billions to Apple Ireland for the right to put little Apple logos on iPhones. Likewise, Google USA pays billions in US ad sales profits to Google Ireland for the right to use Google tech for Google search.
When the Irish loophole closes I'm sure they'll think up another "One Weird Trick" to make taxable profits mystically transmute into untaxable expenses.
Land based ICBMs are more accurate than SLBMs and would launch in retaliation.
The US has stealth cruise missiles it can launch from bombers.
The US has the B1 and B2 bombers that can deliver nukes.
Many Navy ships can launch nuclear cruise missiles.
The USA is the only superpower that has such robust nuclear weapons delivery via a triad (land, air, sea). With Russian SLBM subs it is said they are so noisy that US attack subs are always silently tailing them after they leave port and can take them out before they can launch. Russia and China really only have robust land-based ICBMs. If all of those could be preemptively attacked (by stealth strikes and commando raids) then the US could potentially win a nuclear war. Not that we'd want to try.
Porpoises range in size from the vaquita, at 1.4 metres
(4 feet 7 inches) in length and 54 kilograms (119 pounds)
in weight, to the Dall's porpoise, at 2.3 m (7 ft 7 in)
and 220 kg (490 lb).
Doesn't say what is most common, though, so if 30-70 kg is more common, I'll take your word for it.I thought all alien craft sightings were BS until four separate Navy pilots came forward to say they all saw that white tic tac in 2004. And three of the four pilots have done television interviews, most recently this 60 Minutes one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygB4EZ7ggig
If not for the link between Loch Ness and the ocean I'd think the existence of the monster could probably be ruled out as attention seeking liars. But now that we know porpoises sometimes make the rare trip from the ocean, we can't 100% rule out the monster never does. Does Dochfour Weir have 24/7 thermal and sonar monitoring and recording? Would Dochfour Weir capture on video and count every single porpoise that passes through at 3am, 365 days per year?
I never knew Loch Ness was connected to the ocean at large, and this helps keep a bit of the mystery alive. I had read that detailed sonar and biomass surveys of Loch Ness concluded there could be no large monster there, because there's not enough food to feed something the size of a whale and anything the size of a whale would have been seen by sonar. But the monster could have a lifecycle like salmon, where it is born in freshwater, goes out to the ocean, and eventually returns to freshwater only to reproduce and then die. Porpoises are kinda like mini-whales (they're air-breathing mammals with voracious appetites which can weigh over 200kg), and a school of porpoises wouldn't travel to Loch Ness unless there was a lot of good eatin' there.
1. Frama-C, which enables writing bug-free C programs, is implemented using a combination of OCaml and the Coq proof assistant (which is itself implemented in OCaml):
2. CompCert, a formally verified C compiler, is implemented using OCaml and Coq:
https://github.com/AbsInt/CompCert
Nothing at this level yet exists in the Rust and Zig ecosystems, for example. Rust is a very complicated language with many features which makes formalization much harder than with C and OCaml, which both had mathematical ideas of simplicity, analyzability, and minimalism inspire their designs, even if they continue to grow into more complicated monsters, which, incidentally this OCaml 5.0 release will contribute towards. :-)