In fact the genocide only stopped when a bunch of unsophisticated American (and Russian) farmboys rolled in.
2,235 karma · joined May 2, 2014
In fact the genocide only stopped when a bunch of unsophisticated American (and Russian) farmboys rolled in.
As a chatbot it’s totally fine, virtually indistinguishable from Gemini or ChatGPT or Claude.
For coding it’s… okay. I tried 4.6 and it feels similar to Opus from 12 months ago, or maybe Sonnet from 9 months ago. YMMV.
I assure you, take one look at us and you’ll instantly see that very few of us are in any danger of starving.
This discussion is about students trying to get into top colleges, which is a completely different population with completely different problems from those doing the bare minimum.
Unfortunately most sites and apps have been low quality and getting worse since well before AI coding became a thing. Examples: Lowes, Home Depot, American Airlines - all shockingly bad for companies of that size.
I work with a lot of AI code, and it’s not any worse than what big teams were already producing.
A small team of 2-3 really good humans is in a whole different league, but that has always been a very rare case.
This frees me up to spend more time at the design level, solving harder or more novel problems.
Any adversary who knows the distribution of the plaintext data can guess what your encrypted values are, with accuracy that improves as your sample size increases.
There were a bunch of papers on this 10-12 years ago. (Full disclosure: I was an author on some of them.)
Those guys certainly thought they were being novel and creative, using AI to disrupt an expensive and labor intensive business model. But now with Claude Security, their own market share is going to be gobbled up before they can even get established.
Younger me really enjoyed some of the game programming books by Andre Lamothe.
Most “Learn Language X” books were terrible with over focus on syntax and very little thought into organization.
Brainstorming and research before writing a design.
Writing a design or spec before writing the code.
Comprehensive unit tests.
Etc etc etc.
Like you, I get vastly better output from the tool when I create a detailed spec in markdown before I let it start coding. And bonus, the LLM is pretty good at helping with the spec too.
I agree with you fwiw.
But it’s crazy to complain about getting paid to go to school. A grad stipend is there to minimally support you so you don’t have to get another job and can focus on your research. It’s not supposed to be a career!
They claim the huge advance is in exploiting the bugs.
But if you ask it to get you a shell it’ll probably tell you to get lost.
The claim is that this made Britain a much safer country in later centuries.
The first two happened to me within the span of a month during the three years that I rode Trimet in Portland.
Then why are their reading scores improving so dramatically compared to wealthier states? Especially for under-privileged populations?
Whereas in western countries we have “new Germans” or “new British” from all over the world.
The big advance that they are claiming with Mythos is the ability to triage all the hundreds of candidate vulns and automatically generate exploits to prove that the real ones are real. And if they’re really finding 27-yr-old 0-days in OpenBSD, then it’s not just hype.
But this was the early 2000s and the internet was still “new”. Only the richer areas cared and were willing to pay the price. Letting them have first (or even equal!) access would have made it easier to fund the rollout in low income areas.