cuteboy19

Aren't these the same people who say things like

> the difference between a billion dollars and a million dollars is a billion dollars

Mobility is bad unless it's literally from zero to billion?

There's basically only one way to solve that problem. Are we surprised every time 2+2 is 4?

Mauritius is Asian, located in Africa

I agree that at some point people need to take some responsibility for being scammed. However, it seems that Zelle is engineered in the perfect way to help scammers.

It is as though a committee of engineers and consultants sat together and said "How do we create the perfect vehicle for as many different types of scams as possible?"

  - Maybe! instant settlement
  - No standardized audit trail
  - No way to know who's really on the other side
  - Send money into the void
  - 2FA but not really

The solution for this is instant SMS narratives. If you do any kind of transaction, whether receiving or sending, you will get an SMS detailing the (completed) transaction.

Over time people will be conditioned to wait for the SMS before finishing any transaction

That is how UPI does it anyways

Can you please cite me a single specific case where it has mattered that it was DRS'ed?

It is unfortunate that you lost money chasing after a short squeeze but no amount of conspiracism is going to bring your money back.

What do the scams actually look like?

I don't see how that is relevant. Is there any case where this has actually mattered?

Direct ownership of stocks is costly, slow and generally confers zero benefits.

Some random stock cults stumbled on it, and are now using it as a cult affirmation ritual, kind of like baptism. But it doesn't do anything

I doubt that. The Indian constitution has far stronger anti-caste discrimination provisions than Cali. The BJP has never tried to remove those, so why would they want to do anything here?

That is not categorically true. There is a great diversity of superhero origins. Some are allegories for minorities (X Men), some are not secretive at all and a regular part of society, sometimes it turns out that the organisation is not to our benefit, sometimes they are just plain evil. Still others are secretive but not organized

There is a latency issue, not a throughput issue

People have used the same justification for invasion since the time of the Roman republic. Let us not take justifications for imperialism at face value

It might be true but I doubt a sanctioned nation will be able to continue a largely unproductive enterprise at this scale. They have definitely been punching above their weight so far though, unfortunately it will probably fizzle out soon

It's a problem when America invades Cuba but not when Cuba invades Angola?

Whataboutism can work both ways

I think the java official docs are rarely explanatory, they are just plain description with a lot of fluff and useless information

They actually did modelling of this during the trial. It was found that removing legacy and affirmative action causes negligible change in the white population.

Uninstalling the app or clearing the data might lead to data loss if backups were not done before deactivation afiak

But you can reactivate instantly and it doesn't cause data loss if you don't try anything funny during deactivation

That's what numpy does too.

The app ultimately shows you your decrypted email. If client side code is compromised then I don't think this is the thing you worry about

The .3 btc never returned to him so yes

The concept of limited liability limits this negative scenario. And my limit buy for the entire US stock market @5cents keeps it from going to exact zero

Pseudonymity is not transparency. Transparency in theory is not transparency in practice.

It almost doesn't matter, for example the safemoon team's scams are documented on the Blockchain but the investors don't care. We can't underestimate the financial cultism of crypto people

I meant soda drinks

Also the unsweetened caffeinated drinks taste worse than aspartame

With the SAT, there is nothing that intentionally restricts other people from performing equally well. It is an objective measure in that we know how it is calculated for every single student. We can audit the scores

With the "personality score" we have proof that the score was intentionally created to lower the chances of Asians getting through. Moreover there is no way to audit the scores of a particular student. They do not explain how a score is calculated. Moreover, Harvard alumni scored Asians on par with their other peers, meaning that the metric was created almost certainly to discriminate

Ironically the only people who disagree are 1. Harvard and 2. Sonya Sotomayor

Both of whom support AA

>What if a college instituted a test that has a high chance of weeding out people of a certain race incidentally

Like the "personality score" which somehow curiously scored Asians lower, without even talking to them in person ?

Don't you worry, the universities will make sure that their decisions are so opaque that they won't ever be caught red handed again

Affirmative action helped affluent blacks and Latinos. If you were poor then it very likely did not affect you either way. Your chances were zero and are zero

There is no point in trying to guilt trip liberals here. That energy is better spent elsewhere