771 karma · joined September 8, 2014
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1/co...
I think the purpose of the change was to "increase revenue":
> Requiring that certain research or experimental expenditures be amortized over a five-year period or longer, starting in 2023, would increase revenues by $109 billion over the period from 2023 to 2027.
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/115th-congress...
Idk about our comfort with depictions of violence. We definitely have a history of "cowboy & indian" films, so it could come from the glorification of our genocidal past (or the genocidal past itself). The Vietnam War on the TV every night for a couple decades is another good option.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_search_log_release
The rest of Google's points are worthless hogwash.
The OSD is compatible with GNU licenses; I've read it before. That doesn't change the reality that by reframing the issue from rights to abilities, the OSI created the very environment where Winamp can be released as "open-source" while making forking illegal.
If you want a good look at OSI's commitment to the OSD, take a look at their Open Source AI initiative: https://opensource.org/deepdive https://opensource.org/deepdive/drafts/open-source-ai-defini...
They are directly complicit in propagating the lie of open-source AI. If you can't inspect how it was made, including the actual training the data, you don't have the ability to understand how the AI was made. The choice of the lumber is part of how a chair is made.
Without the "I have the right to know what my computer is doing", there is nothing backing point 2 of the OSD. Without "I have the right to share", there is nothing backing point 1.
https://github.com/unclebob/cmuratori-discussion/blob/main/c...
The linked video is also a good watch.
Test-Driven Design by Example is a good (and fun) read.