Is the juice worth the squeeze?
For some problems, the closer you get to perfection, the harder the next step is.
11,866 karma · joined July 28, 2012
Is the juice worth the squeeze?
For some problems, the closer you get to perfection, the harder the next step is.
Interesting discussions about energetics are best had from a distance.
TNT.....: 4 kJ/gram and 7 MJ/liter
Gasoline: 43 kJ/gram and 33 MJ/literIf 2% of your users complain and leave bad reviews, and only 1% leave good reviews...
I no longer want to make connection with any coworkers.
To be clear, I don't know which part is signal and which part is noise any better than anyone else.
Unfortunately, I also believe that market forces may push away from this direction, as LLM companies try to capture the value stream
People aren't nihilist - social media is.
People aren't shallow - dating apps are.
The world isn't shit - late capital is.
But of course, people are also nihilist, shallow and shit; and those same people are hopeful, complex, patient, kind and loving - but the internet rarely brings those stories to you.
Are you referring to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerogen?
At any rate, this is why I would like to see a better investigation of the subject
Better Kerogen wiki: https://wiki.aapg.org/Kerogen
So I would say yes.
On average though, I would say no.
Solar panels don't convert air to fuel directly, but you could use the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabatier_reaction
From what I've seen, 10,000 barrels per year is a reasonable guestimate.
If that is the case, then just the electrical energy harvested from solar panels in the UK could convert air into fuel at a faster rate than the WHOLE earth (on average over geological time scales) (as long as the fuel conversion/production was at least 1% efficient at converting electricity to fuel).
https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1owp09/if_oil_t...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209624951...
Of course, the preceding paragraph could be re-written in many different ways.
Most maintainability conflicts come from packaging and design for assembly.
Efficiency more often comes into conflict with durability, and sometimes safety.
I wouldn't expect even a lightly informed mid-wit to think that this murderbot held the ground by itself; and I don't think the author expects that either. Thus something else is probably going on. To wit - puffery.
Watching the movie first will set the stage for a lot of details that work better in a book than a movie.