29 karma · joined March 5, 2019
That way if one turns crazy there's More hope
For kids as small as yours the internet would not even be a choice if they were my kids
Pretty much everything in this life is a means towards the end.
We were created to know and love God which is our ultimate end that will satisfy all our desires. Without him you will always feel something is missing.
You're making it harder for people to actually share how to escape an actual cult by calling every religion a cult
Not wanting to try experimental procedures is now anti science
You should be able to defend a position that other people think is immoral specially if you think is morally good.
The Wikipedia link and theory is based on a computer model. No model can predict future innovation because part of future innovation is non linear and hence unpredictable utilizing current trends.
So you have something you can't predict (future innovation and how that will affect energy and new materials).
The burden of proof is on you given that you want to do something unnatural and immoral: make sterile millions of people.
If you want to sterilize yourself I don't agree with it but I cant stop you but that's not enough for you folks, you presume you have the right to promote mass sterilization so yes I'm going to say it for what it is: immoral.
The reality is that if you go back far enough your ancestors were poor by modern standards, and if someone have done what you want to do to the poor today you wouldn't exist.
It is immoral to want for others what you don't want for yourself
I said it is immoral and that we have moral options that work. Or you think wealth can not be created?
No matter how you paint it, you think it is a good thing for you to exist but not others.
"Balance of health, nature and economics" nice words for basically "I want fewer poor people in the world so let's help them sterilize themselves" instead of creating wealth which isn't inherently immoral and would actually have a positive impact if done rightly
That can be software so yes, given that software can be created without limits and that software wealth creation is a subset of total wealth creation that alone is proof that wealth creation is unlimited.
However if you think material resources is the limiting factor then you're going to have to explain exactly what is going to stop scientists from developing new materials that can be used in new products or in existing products.
It is immoral to think the world would be better with fewer people because what you're really saying is, 3 Billion people or whatever number shouldn't exist. If you think not existing is a good thing then we wouldn't be having this conversation would we?
Wealth can be created. There's no limit to how much wealth can be created. Focusing on deleting the population is immoral.
If you tried to establish a slave free society in a small nation sorrounded by slave owner empires how much time do you think that would last?