Oh yes Department of Defense is much less disgusting. Actually, why not just rename it to Ministry of Peace? We can call it Minipax for short.
1,094 karma · joined June 16, 2012
On the other hand, I think Claude is more friendly/readable and also still better at producing out-of-the-box nice looking frontend.
I’ve checked this side by side with colleagues at the airport getting ride quotes to the same hotel. When you have Uber Cash they will quote you more. You can find numerous Reddit threads on the topic as well.
This feels very illegal to me, but not a lawyer.
But lots of execs don't know enough about their own products to interrogate like that. So they settle for BS presentations.
From locking up permits in CEQA reviews to blocking pre-fabricated structures, they are one of the driving factors behind a housing unit costing $700k at the very minimum. This puts housing out of reach for anyone making less than $150k/year.
It’s a 3rd rail issue for anyone in the democratic machine, which is why we won’t see meaningful progress in housing or homelessness under the current incumbents.
I’m actually pro union in most other contexts, especially when workers are underdogs. But in CA there are some unions which are quite powerful, exclusionary, and have negative effects on society.
- No need for chit chat, you can just work / talk on the phone / play music
- No 18-hour shift sweat and deodorant smell
- No cursing at other drivers or awkward apologies because of fear of a bad rating
- Smooth, predictable driving. I have yet to have a “holy shit” moment in a Waymo, but this happens regularly in Uber / Lyft.
Also on safety, about 50% of the population has to worry a lot more about being abducted/hit on/stalked/etc. Uber and Lyft know this and have gone to great lengths to recruit female drivers, set up safety hotlines, etc. Not having to worry about the driver is a big deal.
I say this because my experience of hiring and employing people really shifted my opinion in favor of maximum diligence unfortunately.
It seems as though it should be possible (though perhaps not easy) to automatically detect an aircraft on runway and relay that to the approaching aircraft.
With all respect for the coast guard pilots who died, I would say this incident is the "best case" scenario we could hope for when two large aircraft crash on a runway. Had the other plane been carrying passengers the casualties could have easily been in the hundreds.
It seems odd to me that with all the safety advancements in aviation we don't have the technology to prevent this.
There isn't really anything about the certification process that's binding, and it's definitely gamed. There are multiple MLMs that are certified B-corps. I would liken it to those semi-paid 40 under 40 lists that pop up every year.
For example, a $10,000 donation obscures that the lobbying group might also have threatened to donate millions to a competitor in the next election.
Most incumbents stay in office not by advancing any particular policy, but by not making themselves an enemy of interests that could mount a campaign to replace them.
On the one hand, I actually respect their principles. OpenAI has become the company its nonprofit was formed to prevent. Proprietary systems. Strong incentive to prioritize first-to-market over safety. Dependency on an entrenched tech co with monopolistic roots.
On the other hand, this really feels like it was done hastily and out of fear. Perhaps the board realized that they were about to be sidelined and felt like this was their last chance to act. I have to imagine that they knew there would be major backlash to their actions.
In the end, I think Sam creating his own company would be better for competition. It's more consistent with OpenAI's original charter to exist as the Mozilla (though hopefully more effective) of AI than as the Stripe of AI.
In both instances they said to lock my credit, and provide free credit monitoring for a year.
I find this egregiously insufficient to the point where I think we need more regulation in this space. They should provide lifelong credit monitoring and full insurance on any financial fraud that now occurs on my behalf, as well as immediate presumptive financial compensation.
That aside, the root cause here is that identity in the U.S. is a dumpster fire. We have no distinction between unique identifier (SSN) and secret (also SSN). Every other security question is just another version of the same factor type (something you know) which is easily accessible to scammers.
There is quite literally no agreed upon way to prove you are who you say you are.
We need DMVs to begin issuing IDs that are physical with digital capabilities, like credit cards. We need the equivalent of Apple/Android Pay for identity online. We need to mandate that banks support digital IDs. And we need strict enforcement for people who misuse a digital ID.
I believe that the consequence of ignoring this problem is at least tens of billions of dollars in GDP annually lost to fraud. And perhaps more importantly, it’s an insidious erosion of our status as a country of laws.
Immigrants (at the scale Spain needs) don’t want to move to a shrinking economy. Spaniards themselves are leaving the country to look for work. As an example, Central American immigrants will immigrate through multiple low growth countries specifically to get to the U.S. for work.
To GP’s point though, I think Spain’s population problems aren’t all that related to dense apartments and more tied to economic opportunities.
Also, check out your local running clubs on Strava. I know social running isn’t for everyone, but it’s a really good way to push your speed up. Every club I’ve run with has been psyched to get a new person.