crugej

If you want to keep the individual commits rather than squash the into a single commit. This is useful if the author of the PR actually wrote good commits that you don't want to make into a single commit. I'm also thinking of the case where a squash could turn a series of commits into a single commit with a massive amount of changes that is harder to grok when going back historically.

There is, it is called browserify and npm :)

Finally something to replace the awful bitcoin-qt. Get the best of both worlds with a "gui" that is in the terminal.

So the company who owns the rights to it can make a nice chunk of change off new book purchases (especially the purchases made by the buzz from the movie).

Very interesting. Begs the question to whether facebook plans to disrupt itself with the Instagram acquisition somewhere down the line.

I have been waiting to see this company die and I hope the end is near. They may try and save it with virtual currency gambling as their next con on the human brain but it is inevitable.