211 karma · joined December 5, 2014
That's one where you throw money at the problem. You hire a custom operator to handle ADA-requests (and similar) and you pay the price difference for someone who does manage this. Legal compliance issues, you often turn into a mega-expensive non-engineering one-offs.
Or you get slapped with a DoJ investigation, and lose the business.
Management has a big picture individuals often lack. That's an important part of the process. On the other hand, it shouldn't dominate the process.
1. In many cases, there is a ~30ms floor on operations if a server is non-local. That's true of virtually all services on AWS -- whether SQS, SNS, SES, RDS (MySQL/PostgreSQL), etc.
2. In many cases, rows are missing. A table has a million rows. Ten are deleted. It's not compacted. So it's not a simple size lookup. A lot of this depends on how the data is stored/indexed. That's something which is naively pretty slow, but easily optimized.
RMS's ideology seems to work better than the mainstream one.
Revoking a government-granted monopoly is very libertarian. Revoking mutual consent is the opposite.
In this case, there are many issues (indeed, most of what idiot wrote is not correct), but to give one: op is taking money from people in different states, placing orders with delivery services there, etc. Contrast that with idiot's statement about no jurisdiction and frivolous lawsuits.
Worse idea: giving incorrect legal advice without a license.
Jurisdiction is complex. With the Internet, you do not need to have a physical location somewhere to do business there.