Liberalism and Confucianism both bind you together in a form of justice which takes on an enlightened understanding of the other, rather than a simple modus vivendi.
In aggregate all the employment just represents society. There is a difference between engaging services and employing someone, and the heavy preference for engaging a human as services is part of the problem. It is no different from engaging a human as a good. If we all play by the same rules, then the contours of the market are not unfairly balanced toward one player. The market and social life are not distinct; contract law should protect all stakeholders as you mentioned.
There is a right to work under the responsibility to protect. Industry structure that produces a permanent underclass is a form of violence, and class warfare.
Why is it better for an institution to be agnostic about everything? If they just act rationally from their perspective then its easier to predict and make sense of things
I was just at the one in EPA by Facebook and I thought the same damn thing. Dudes with facial scars and a limp come through to get a meal for $10/2000calories, students as well grabbing a snack on their way home from one of the nine schools nearby. Its like a YMCA for homeless people, along with the library.
But then you have to define racists, and this prevents people who are not racist from speaking out of fear of being discriminated against. The cure is worse than the disease. Discrimination is bad.