counttheforks

Do you hand out the keys for free? If not you are still punishing people who have the moral high ground.

Did anyone force you to use either of those to complete your education? No? What's your point again?

The security of their personal devices on which they must install Microsoft spyware and accept it's terms, before being allowed to complete their education.

The problem is being required to install Microsoft spyware on your personal devices

The school should be providing phones if the students require them. I strongly believe 2fa is important, but it is even more important to acknowledge that not everyone owns the gadgets that you do. And they may not want to. So if a service requires 2fa they should also supply the necessary hardware to all of their users.

You can get a locksmith to come pick the lock

Nah, I think you might be. Most people I know have locked themselves out once or twice.

I can't wait for no organization to be contactable anymore. Give it a year or two and every form of communication will be handled by a ChatGPT bot.

> the answer is most likely the author

So ChatGPT? The book includes unvetted output that was copied verbatim (As an language model blablabla)

Then they should do a better job themselves...

stop spamming please

If a company wants to do business abroad they'll have to conform to those laws. And the law cares about intent.

As always the law is about intent. It doesn't care about your technical arguments.

More proof that Apple should be broken up. Split them in two, a hardware company and a software company.

And? Sounds perfectly legal to do, and something that should 100% be possible.

Sounds like it would be trivial to compromise your phone number and sms 2fa

There's a different media volume and call volume.

Should've kept your laptop on mute

What's the risk there? That some people might be unhappy with him while he's sipping champagne in his multi million villa? Sign me up.

Sweet, thanks.

I'd like copy-on-write hardlinks, or deduplicated blocks, that are made automatically on a schedule as to not incur the constant overhead of dedup, but still reap some of the benefits for archival.

They're the CEO so they can get away with making themselves bonkers rich

Guy has made 226M in a year. He won't have to work another day in his life. What reputational risk are you talking about?

Why would he possibly need 226M/year? Believe it or not, most of the world manages fine with (much) less than 1M/year.

I never really understood this. Can a company go to prison or get the death penalty?

Perhaps I misunderstood you? What did you mean with

> instead you are seen as a blank slate and whatever actions you do impact your life here and the life hereafter

I assumed you meant that people will be welcomed because they are a blank slate that can be written upon by those seeking to influence them.

Breastfeeding is not porn

So you are saying they are invited as long as they are willing to endure people trying to change them?

Are they banning Google accounts for this?

Not sure why I got downvoted from this. The link shows the message:

> You may be executing code that is disallowed, ant his may restrict your ability to use Colab in the future.

Is this restricted because your google account gets deactivated or something more reasonable?

It should happen way more often, so it becomes ineffective.