144 karma · joined July 24, 2023
Professors often approach public debate by assuming everyone else is braindead, rather than puzzling through conflicting information.
For example, they immediately dismiss the president's claim that a demographic change contributes to this issue as "false" because the US birth rate may have been very stable. But that says nothing about parents in the WVU area, which we know are either older or moved to other states.
Yep, this is exactly who WFH benefits, and nobody else.
I disagree. The vast majority of people benefit from basic supervision and accountability.
Yep, what you want is a good and predictable approximation.
> What point are you trying to make?
In practice most Matlab solutions you are describing are awful, in terms of performance and in terms of accuracy due to ignorance about underlying theory.
> The point is that 3-5 years of analysis might be an overkill
Rarely have I met an engineer and said, wow that guy knows TOO much about math. What do you think they should substitute?
> if you don't need the more general case and its associated performance cost
In C++ the "more general case" typically doesn't have a performance cost.
And they use poor and imprecise approximations that they can't debug, because they just plug in numbers and hope for answer.
What if you want to make a numerical method for something you can't look up the recipe for?
This quote reflects a very European attitude towards wealth to me. I believe PG specifically talks about possible origins of this idea.
- visa workers who have no bargaining power.
- younger people who are mobile
- moving offices to other places
There have been a few recent posts about struggling to find jobs... every time it turns out they are only applying to online listings for remote jobs, and have high standards. That's not a situation you're likely to stand out in.
I just don't see how global remote work as the norm is "pro worker" for anyone except those already well established in their career. Besides being more disposable, what happened to complaints about companies not providing job resources or training? Did we give up on that one?
Ok, im serious. It's silly to quote someone when you don't have a rebuttal.
2008 was 15 years ago, and didn't hit tech as hard as other industries. The last serious one was early 2000s. A significant number of people "in it for the money" or with non-traditional credentials simply had to leave the field.
That came later. He just had a flexible gig that was common for researchers at the time. From what I can tell, none of his behavior would be accepted today:
- participating in a new field without formal credentials
- not writing papers or participating in peer review
- writing books and papers without citing other works
- bouncing between academic and industry roles
Academic research is just a different world, with very different life tradeoffs, even for "big' names.
I don't think that's the case with latency, as we can measure that directly.
> There's a lot of ways in which modern computing is far nicer than it was in the past.
And resource consumption and latency isn't one of them.
They already know the photos have the objects they are interested in. Are they still working on motorcycles buses and signs?
The recaptcha part doesn't even depend on recognition, it's just a statistical comparison with what other humans clicked on given the same prompt + some pointer analysis and browser fingerprinting.
I'm sympathetic to your argument, but I think also many problems (or popular implementations) turned out to be quadratic. For example, the resolution of windows 95 applications vs today.