How they go about stuff with that felt so weird, cause I would never get the same recruiter, makes sense they would do something like this.
61 karma · joined May 11, 2017
How they go about stuff with that felt so weird, cause I would never get the same recruiter, makes sense they would do something like this.
This depends on how your relationship with your boss is and how they are. I once encountered the start of burn out and told my boss, and he said to go do something fun. So I played video games while he covered for me and let me know if I was needed for a meeting. It was great and I skirted burn out.
- Should I take time off? How much? Or should I try to work reduced hours?
I have taken up backpacking and have loved taking a day off or two to go out into the woods. I really love just disconnecting from the world.
- If I continue working, is there something in my working environment I should try to change?
Maybe try different text editors? I don't know if doing that would bring more stress as you have to learn new stuff. But, maybe you want to learn it, its up to you.
- Is there anything specific to working in tech and burning out that I should know about?
Burnout as I have been told and experienced is normal, but its usually a sign that something is off like a lot more work has been thrown at you or your team, or you feel like your contributions are not getting the attention you want. Or, you just want to not work because your brain is tired of always working.
As for boredom and not liking it, I have found that it pays to do nothing some times and just daydream at home, doing absolutely nothing. It helps my brain rest and clear out all its stressors.
Also keep in mind this advice is what works for me, but it may work for you. Take it with a grain of salt.
I understand that K8 does many things but its also how you look at the problem. K8 does one thing well, manage complex distributed systems such as knowing when to scale up and down if you so choose and when to start up new pods when they fail.
Arguably, this is one problem that is made up of smaller problems that are solved by smaller services just like SystemD works.
Sometimes I wonder if the Perlis-Thompson Principle and the Unix Philosophy have become a way to force a legalistic view of software development or are just out-dated.
I have had and continue to have the opposite experience of you. I use Ubuntu with VS Code and a few C# plugins that have greatly allowed me to navigate the .NET Core framework and write code with minimal references.
Even, with Visual Studio (unless you use R#), you will always run into issues where you aren't sure where the function or class lives. That's why you go read the documentation or ask SO.
The more you write webapi's the easier it is.
> Structural Typing
Dynamic was the closest to it, but it has significant performance issues. Tuples and structs do exist also.
> Allow functions outside of classes
No.
> Verbosity in C#
????
> most popular libraries will nudge you strongly to use Dependency Injection throughout the app and implement everything as a class and to extract interfaces out of it.
You do realize C# is mostly a strong Object Oriented language hence why they (the libraries) urge you to do that.
If you want functional so much use F#.
Xamarin is both yes, though it really integrates into Visual Studio so its more of a tool? I am not sure, definitions like that are a bit murky.
With that being said, I worked for a firm that extended the life of old ERP systems and we had to do a few mobile apps, we chose Xamarin because we were a shop of 7ish devs that had many projects to maintain and the cost of code sharing and familiarity with C# were our driving factors. It was a trade off most definitely but it was a pragmatic choice as well.
If you are capable of hiring more developers who know Java or Obj-C and can allow them to do only mobile development then its worth it to go native.
But, if you are a small company and know that Java,C# and Obj-C, C# developers are a little bit hard to find (depending on your developer market) then its probably more cost effective to go Xamarin or any other cross-platform code sharing model.
In the end its all about pragmatism.
Are you saying that if person X goes out and starts calling for mass shootings to rid the world of Y, that they wouldn't be arrested?
You know you can't yell fire in a crowded room and not get litigation and charges brought against you.
So, maybe 8chan just ran past the fine line of hate speech vs encouraging acts of hate. I.e you can be racist but you cannot encourage acts of extremism.
If 8Chan was a breeding ground for Islamic Extremists would people be okay with still existing?
Even, a political grass roots revolution would be unsuccessful as many people are resistant to change and would not back it.
Incrementalism is the best approach as it slowly changes people and doesn't get their defenses up from the get go.
To be even more precise, the system or theory T proves that there is no number n which provides a proof of contradiction for the axioms of T.
So its the axioms of the systems which all formal systems assume and hold to be true. Basically its impossible to prove that axioms are true with the same system.
In short, no formal system can define its own consistency because in order for its axioms to be true, the system must be inconsistent.
That exe file is not even in the directory for it.
Is there a way to make the "Staged Files" view appear at the top of the tool? Preferably above "Working Directory" ?
But maybe a required reading? People are taking it as a survey course, an introduction, so it would be nice to give a little teaser or something of stuff that is to come later on.
When I took Intro to Comp Sci, we didn't even go over design patterns and what makes good code. We did get instilled into us the principle of Single Responsibility.
As for trick questions, I got them in my Math Major and the comp sci classes I took. So, idk, if having trick questions is necessarily a deterrent, especially for a course preparing you for college.
But, when I see a list like this. Its quite obvious that this is coming from a mindset of the average user should not be using software at all.
Imagine if you will, your grandma always calling you up because she got lost in the textual interface. Yeah that would get old fast.
Also how would one look at cat pictures through a textual interface?
She had this one child that was severely non-verbal, she did everything in her power to get the County school system to do the right thing but they refused to give her the classes she needed. So, long story short, the parents refused to give up and told their Pastor. The Church went to court and won and the kid got their services. The kid afaik is still non-verbal but is doing much better.
When my mom asked the pastor, why the church went to bat was because they had hope that the kid would get better and it was the right thing to do.
Now, I say all this to say this, that people will do what they think is right. They want their best for their children just as the parent who stubbornly got their church to go to bat for them. And the parents who put their children in homes want the best quality of life.
And I don't necessarily see them as giving up, we perceive that, but I feel deep down, they aren't. They want whats best for their kid.
The whole point of the ADA is to not treat people with disabilities as if they are second class citizens.
The political fall-out would be terribad.