740 karma · joined January 25, 2009
One example is anecdote, not data, but I know an awful lot of EU and non-EU people both in the big cities and more regional places who landed without any local language and made successful lives and integrated effectively here.
There are harder places to do this but it’s getting easier by the year, especially in the countries that need people who speak other languages for global trade.
What recent algorithms with transformative applications have been discovered sine 2000?
The regulation mostly expands regulation - there are already EBA requirements around outsourcing for a smaller list of financial institutions - in the European Economic Area (EEA, sort of EU plus) to ensure financial institution operational resilience (ie to ensure they won't fall over when technical or operational issues occur internally or in their tech supply chains).
The regulation, amongst other things, is concerned with direct or indirect use of "ICT third party suppliers" and requires that financial institutions keep tabs on that, make sure that they've got the right contractual stuff in place, are doing risk management, and are testing their "digital operational resilience".
Most SMEs won't be hit by this at all.
If you are classified as a crypto asset manager, or are a critical supplier to a fairly generic list of financial institution types, you'll be in discussions already with your clients to help them rule you out of scope since you aren't going to be critical to their ongoing operations.
There will not be badges or accreditation any time soon as far as I understand. If you're in scope, it's all going to be contractual between you and your client, and mostly to ensure that you're doing risk management with YOUR suppliers and can do incident response and reporting. All stuff serious businesses should be doing already.
See the EBA's information page [0] and look for RTS on ICT TPP. Again, it's not going to be the SME's responsibility unless you're a DORA financial institution.
[0] https://www.eba.europa.eu/publications-and-media/press-relea...
Time is one of those human constructs that isn’t strongly bound to geographic or perhaps even physical reality. Look at the International Date Line or Chinese timezone maps for examples that are “bigger” than Africa/Melila and Africa/Ceuta.
We should all be glad that people are thanklessly doing the hard work to keep the TZ databases updated.
The last part of any semi-difficult project nearly always takes much longer than the officially difficult “main problem” to solve.
It leads to the last 10% of the deliverables costing at least 90% of the total effort for the project (not the planned amount; the total ad calculated after completion, if that ever occurs)
This seems to endlessly surprise people in tech, but also many other semi-professional project domains (home renovations are a classic)
GP was talking about something else though, the 90:90 rule is related to an extremely common planning optimism fallacy around work required to demo, and work required to productise.
The cognitive load of managing expectations of clients, investors, etc who are trained to expect the stand way of doing things seems to get too much though, over time.
https://github.com/porter-dev/porter-archive
They've probably forked the cloud product, and are leaving the old OSS version up?
These places have experienced continuous and significantly rapid linguistic and cultural change for centuries now. If anything high levels of literacy and experience of integrating minorities by force over the last centuries might be making this latest set of changes fairly gentle and manageable…
I’ve not really observed it myself, and I’d suspect that part of it might be very different styles or ways of working. But maybe there’s a grain of truth there.
Edit:spelling and clarification on intake