27 karma · joined November 17, 2010
The author suggests that misinformation and a philosophical problem is to blame. This is the premise of the article. Then he writes a statement like this. For his assertion he needs to find proof that there's a deliberate campaign to mislead the public.
The author offers nothing of the sort in his citations. His inference is lazy and sensationalist, even before getting into whether his premise is actually true.
Call me a cynic, but it's one thing to argue from a technical skills background, but there's no way anyone could bootstrap 'an instagram'.
Also, you used the example of Greece or Italy. I assume you put Spain in the same category, so its interesting to note that Spain was running a surplus in the years leading up to the crisis.
Budget deficits are not the be all-end all of government finance. Deficits matter, but relative to other metrics.
Kind of tautology, no?
"Hey, this special President speech tonight... this mood, is it Osama?"
silence
The media guys then call up every old defence contact they have, old generals, the like, who probably got the news a little earlier. They get something, and run with it.
Things don't need to 'leak', sometimes the gravity and mood just tells the story.
Hypothetical vs Real. Is this really comparable?
It all must be viewed in context.