It tried to and would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling kids.
Did you not read the memo?
1,229 karma · joined June 5, 2015
It tried to and would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling kids.
Did you not read the memo?
This article is misleading horse shit.
In fact, that guy has probably long since left and is doing his own beer analytics startup.
IDE is awesome. Debugging tools are rawsome. Build tools can be... Well you've got choices. Workspace setup is easy
No.
And the software to do those things isn't worth billions.
WeWokeUp.
The morale there must be terrible. Anyone good who survives the cuts will GTFO to greener pastures.
Anyone who stays or anyone desperate enough to join will be terrible.
Good bye We, consider this my eulogy, we hardly knew ye, and may you rest in peepee.
I would take impoliteness over toxic ideology backed by fake news any time. Listen to George Carlin much?
This whole line of thinking exemplifies why tech bros at places like Facebook and Twitter are so tone deaf to this whole problem.
You draw the line at "LMAO" but allow pro eugenics posts through?
Here's one in 2018:
Eugenics has a bad name, but it is scientifically valid. We now know that genetics play a huge role in life outcomes (e.g. adult IQ appears to be 70-80% heritable) and, for better or for worse, the eugenicists were right, even if their methods were morally wrong. We don't focus enough on positive eugenics: getting smart, non-violent and conscientious people to have large families. Right now we do the opposite: smart folks feel all sorts of pressures to have a small or no family due to careers, the expense of elite schooling, the environment, etc. The opening scene of Idiocracy nailed it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17237184
That post is one big fucking lie. Was it flagged? Nope.
I am beginning to really loathe the hypocrisy of techies of your ilk.
If you outlaw this, people like me (who think inflicting stupidly and ill-health on their children by withholding these technologies is morally wrong) will just fly to Singapore. Even if you could enforce this, not every country will. 5+ standard deviation increases in many traits is on the table
Nope, 5+ std deviations is not on the table.
That is your reasoning, not mine.
It's not against the rules to be wrong, though. How could this be otherwise? Do you think we have a truth detector?
This smacks of the same kind of arrogant obliviousness that is insidious at Facebook and Twitter. Do you really think misinformation is not a problem there either?
You counter the problem with a reputation system that actually works. See Stack Exchange. Also with better moderation on your effort.
Maybe you should try searching HN for eugenics and see which gems you come across.
Look up some accounts (jlawson) and you will find they consistently post right wing BS here.
Or just search HN for eugenics and see all the crazy claims made...
Plenty other examples, but due to ignorance, like someone giving a long convincing explanation of the thermodynamics behind the efficiency of steam engines which sounded entirely convincing. But was complete utter horse shit once researched, and no one refuted it. But it was upvoted plenty.
This is a bit like complaining about the existence of books because you never learned how to read.
My point is that people casually browsing this place are going to be infected by the misinformation and spread it to others. All while the mods overfit on whether someone's response wasn't polite enough, which in a lot of cases is biased to begin with.
Stack Exchange is a much, MUCH more reliable source of information than the horse shit I see pranced around here on a daily basis. Their moderation system actually works because it empowers knowledgeable users.
HN has plenty of misinformation posted on it constantly. Countless posts that are objectively wrong, and in many cases it is done intentionally. I have seen lies supporting eugenics, lies about how quantum computing is a fake conspiracy, etc etc. And yet the mods only jump in when you're impolite by referring to OP with "you" and "you're" because it is a "personal attack". They are optimizing on the wrong problem, IMO. I would rather discuss with people who are snide rather than with liars who have an agenda.
HN has its own "fake news" problems. And this is the society we are living in; you can say anything as long as it doesn't offend or hurt someone's feelings. Even if it is objectively fake horse shit.
Bayes Theorem is easily derived algebraically using conditional probability and the chain rule. You can also derive it easily with a Venn diagram. There is barely any notation needed at all here to understand it.
If you're struggling with things at that level, it is more likely due to your own laziness, not because the math is hard. Because it is very easy to reason about.
Yikes.
But if I am in over my head, I hope I get fired. Because at least I was challenged enough where I hit my limit for the first time, from a technical standpoint. And then I will be free to move on and do something else with my life.
If I succeed, then I will be happy continuing to succeed in this role, working on difficult problems. So it is a win win.
At least Meteor never got that far.
I like to be more thoughtful about my QPS and payload sizes.