I know that there are linux alternatives but I find them awkward to use and much prefer the Adobe/MS suite.
6 karma · joined January 15, 2012
I know that there are linux alternatives but I find them awkward to use and much prefer the Adobe/MS suite.
Raised the exposure when needed, fixed white balance, etc...photoshop has been doing this since like 1990.
Their bets were not that large $50... wonder what aspect of their play got them flagged.
I would assume the bookies are aware of when they are offering an odd that is above market...they also would know that this is an areas where they are potentially exposed. So maybe they report on that and see who is betting exclusively on those positions?
Confusing though - because they are often offering those odds because they want to balance their position to reduce risk...so wouldn't they want people to be on those odds?
Should I quit it (brokeback style), spend some time making it mobile + setting a annual fee and trying to find the magic adwords amount to grow my userbase without losing money or keep on keeping on (trying to make some ad revenue with my current userbase of 150ish)
My site posts a timeline post when a user creates a new round (unless you have turned that off). So it is kind of a free impression so I prefer facebook sign-ups. Maybe that is a project for the winter make it mobile (jquery mobile?) and implement some sort of payment system. $10/year seems fair to me. Just have to figure out an amount that will cover my hosting + adwords spend on a typical month.
Then I had $50 of Facebook credit and that turned into like 20-30 users.
Just don't know what to do at this point. Don't want to spend more time adding features if it is not going to lead to anything.
Was thinking of making it like $10 a year or something and trying to get paid users instead of ad users. Just not sure if anyone would even pay $10.
I can't tell you the number of times I have made a change then run regression testing and found unforeseen failures which I wouldn't have caught without my test cases.
Only difference is that you have to go through the legwork of finding your advertisers where as a typical joke site would just show affiliate ads and/or ad words.
I think the time you are spending finding advertisers to sponsor your jokes would negate any extra revenue you would get vs. just letting a ad network find the advertisers for you.
If your content is actually good and you execute this well and you manage to get traffic then you probably want to focus on your joke writing and not finding advertisers.
I bet you won't get a lot of direct conversions but indirectly I bet you will get more organizers getting exposed to the offering.
I would focus less on the club benefits and more on how fun it is to play. Very few people run clubs/organizations but tons of people would be interested in playing and might nudge organizers towards it.
I have no problem with people having the right to do this type of stuff because I enjoy my right to laugh about it.
Only about 1 in 3 choose the Facebook option.
My first project was a golf statistics/handicap site. (http://www.golfingstat.com) It took me a ton of time and it was super frustrating at times but I learned a shitload just running into a brick wall and googling/posting on StackOverflow to find answers.
If asked whether I wanted to talk about someone else for 4 cents (the maximum they offered) or myself for free I would choose to talk about myself not because I enjoy talking about myself but because I don't want 4 pennies in my pocket.
Pennies are shitty and I would guess a lot of people would see pennies as a penalty.