But I agree that innovation is often incremental efforts of exploration and convergence, like how we got to where we are in VR today. Magical phenomenal change like iPhone is rather exceptional.
316 karma · joined May 30, 2013
But I agree that innovation is often incremental efforts of exploration and convergence, like how we got to where we are in VR today. Magical phenomenal change like iPhone is rather exceptional.
But most Americans don't fuck with DPRK even if for some reason they decide to travel there. The core of the problem is they underestimate how "totalitarian" China is.
China's is a relatively new threat. On top of that, it could be hard to get a grasp of how hostile China is when the Chinese officials on TV often sound so normal and friendly.
It's similar for the rest of the world
The Hundred-Year Marathon: China's Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower [0] by Hudson Institute's China expert.
and
Unrestricted Warfare: China's Master Plan to Destroy America [1]
These are rather hawkish but unfortunately also nailing the truth.
[0] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/20696000-the-hundred-yea...
[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/855077.Unrestricted_Warf...
But I doubt if the trade off is worth it to trouble the user even when it's not shared to anyone.
This fund is the most popular among locals.
Open and honest discussion leads to truth. And truth about china is not allowed in china.
However, it's free, plus there are lots of templates out there, plus there are auto animate and integration with other Adobe tools. It's not the best at anything, but is good enough at everything for my needs.
However people grew up in China are trained to be punished and even disappeared when they speak or act against the chinese official rhetoric, where as being patriotic in the officially approved ways is rewarding.
This extends to them enjoying watching people get punished and disappeared when they speak or act against the chinese official rhetoric. It's immoral and irrational, but it's also human nature. These brainwashing started even before they have the ability to reason.
There are many who chose to sit-in at the airport since they do not agree with the escalation of the protests in other districts. Also there are elderlies and parents who have to carry and look after their children, who just cannot bear tear gas and rubber pullets.
This act by the government will only catch more foreign attention, and put more pages on the pile of recent police brutality.
The problem is everyone is not perfect. Power and wealth corrupts. And even if we are lucky to have the ideal situation at some point, no one can guarantee the next.
That's why we need separation of power: a system with checks and balances. I think as of now we don't have a equation to make the perfect system, but democracy is proven to be the best we've got so far.
Honestly English being THE international language is certainly a reflection of the power of English speaking nations. It's no wonder China fancy having that.
I live in Hong Kong, which is the most extreme example of this.
And I've also witnessed how this whole process is accelerated in China, since greed and corruption are more prevalent.
I believe at least at the early stage capitalism trickle down economics works. However, without proper checks and balance system, corruption brought by power and wealth does stop the trickle down effect.
Therefore in China where corruption is an accepted norm, it's doomed to fail. That was not originally planned though.
Maybe that's also why recently the CCP has been trying so hard to abolish religions, to keep the people's moral standard low.
If anything, the Chinese government has higher incentive to clamp down the Chinese version as Chinese content has a wider reach and thus higher impact on the local people.
So human rights violations is not a thing in China. Under the current Chinese government's rule, the people do not have rights, unless, of course, when the "rights" are beneficial to the longevity of the CCP.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_Number_Nine
[1]: https://cn.nytimes.com/china/20130820/c20document/dual/
This is exactly why I see a ray of hope since Canada announced she will ban single use plastic in near future [0].
I hope international cooperations grasp this chance to abandon as much plastic as possible altogether in the global supply chain, not just to cater to Canada's upcoming regulations.
[0]: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/06/canad...
Speaking from experience, it is difficult to wrap a liberal mind around this.
From my limited understanding, pro Beijing people support rule by fear, since fear is the very reason they support the communist party.
They fear to even flich no matter what the communist party does to them, because they fear the revenge. That's why they want others to feel the same. That's why they approve of the violent suppression of protests. They don't believe there is hope for resistance, so they choose the winning side.
It's selfish, irrational, and immoral. There were judenrats during world war 2, and red guards during China's cultural revolution. It's all the same.
Yes it does look fishy. Today we have TensorFlow lite and Core ML, but to me it makes sense they did it this way back then.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FaceApp
[1]: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2017/06/ios-11-brings-new-fea...
The Chinese government has been actively monitoring [0] all popular online messaging platforms, and shutting down any opinion that is considered by the government anti-government.
There is also some new network security law [1] that enforces companies, from ISP to website operators, to self-censor, and to pinpoint every action from every user, such that officials could collect the data as they wish [2].
The whole process is already well organized and somewhat automated. Now that the social credit score system is being deployed to more major cities, the threat of free speech is climbing to the next level.
You may say they don't fear. But I argue that many Chinese citizens don't even realize why they feel very uncomfortable and insecure to talk about politics. They think people who voice out are stupid. The reason deep down, is fear.
[0]: https://twitter.com/0xDUDE/status/1101909112131080192
[1]: http://www.hk-lawyer.org/content/china-passes-network-securi...
[2]: https://www.zdnet.com/article/chinas-cybersecurity-law-updat...
> Huawei said they would "provide industry-leading products and services... to build a safer and smarter society with the public security department of the autonomous region." Three months later, the company launched the Huawei Urumqi DevCloud to "promote the development of the software information industry in the district and all of Urumqi."
If that's not enough, please read this another article also from forbes [0].
[0] https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2019/04/25/huawei-xi...
Huawei is likely one of the companies that contributed to this very Xinjiang endeavour [0].
Even if it's not directly related, by buying a Huawei phone, you are voting with your money to support a company that's been hurting innovation with IP theft through the years [1].
[0] https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2019/05/25/huawei-ac...
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/huaweis-yearslong-rise-is-litte...
I don't think the two countries are even remotely comparable on this front.