Here's the primary source: http://atomicdelights.com/blog/a-glimpse-at-how-the-apple-wa... -- absolutely worth a read.
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9195042
3,480 karma · joined November 4, 2009
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9195042
Source: listened to the call this morning.
Also interesting to see that the Falcon Heavy boosters are literally just Falcon 9s strapped to the sides of a larger rocket. They will be producing just two separate rockets on the factory floor. This is how SpaceX will really squeeze out manufacturing efficiencies.
Given the Falcon 9 reusability, we're going to see launch costs drop by two entire magnitudes. Instead of destroying an $60MM launch vehicle, each launch just burns $200,000 in fuel. This will open up space in ways we have never imagined.
Edit: this is downvoted, but a similar comment with the same link, posted 10 minutes later, is upvoted? I don't understand.
How do you know they aren't going to use it?
Personally I don't really like these changes, but let's not be disingenuous.
If the work was not infringing and the notice was either
in error or malicious, the client can then file what is
known as a counter-notice. That notice must contain the
following elements:
...
4. The subscriber's name, address, and telephone number,
and a statement that the subscriber consents to the
jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial
district in which the address is located, or if the
subscriber's address is outside of the United States, for
any judicial district in which the service provider may be
found, and that the subscriber will accept service of
process from the person who provided notification.