clircle

StrongBox.

There will be a smidgen of irony if the authors have to convert this to Word to submit to their journal.

This blog-post might actually do more harm than good, by giving readers the misconception that logistic regression can generally be used to classify images. In general, it's terrible at this task!

Damn, I think I played this game like 20 years ago on my friends computer? (taking breaks from playing Aliens vs Predator 2)

I can't use this because it would feel like I'm cheating on Emacs. But it looks cool!

> Interestingly, when I see Bayesians simulate random data (to introduce the concepts on this data) they usually assume a true parameter value. E.g. when sampling from Y = a + b * X + e, they'll assume fixed, true values of a and b and not random variables - which is a frequentist assumption! So far I've never seen e.g. b being sampled from Normal(mu=2, sigma=1) instead of just setting b=2.

The Bayesian philosophy of "random parameters" does not mean that Bayesian methods cannot be assessed for frequentist properties or compared against frequentist procedures.

I think most Bayesians would claim that point null hypothesis tests are immoral or something like that, rather than propose to do them with a Bayesian model (thus avoiding measure zero problems)

I don't really see Frequentism and Bayes to be in conflict. You use them to answer different questions. I wouldn't test a point null hypothesis with a Bayesian model.

I think it's because it's relatively simple to make an note taking app or system, and everyone has an opinion on how to take notes, so you end up with a proliferation of note apps, and a bunch of fake innovation.

Also, software developers are naturally biased against Microsoft Office. For no good reason.

I agree with your colleague.

At my institution, all of the lowest quality drafts I read are made with latex. I think it's because the programs people use to write latex do not have spelling and grammar checking. Also, the people that prefer latex, are the same types of people that are more interested in technical things, than spelling and grammar.

I think vim users highly overestimate their productivity and just like the way using hotkeys feels.

Spotify's push to include more shit that will further crowd the UI and require spamming us outside the OS's native notification protocol sparks annoyance among users.

Every estimate/prediction/forecast/interpolation/extrapolation should have a confidence/prediction/ or tolerance interval (application dependent) that incorporates the assumptions that the team is putting into the problem.

Yep, the consult suite and rg are two of my favorite things. And I'm not even a SWE.

Is this the kind performance gap that a windows patch is going to narrow ?

I'm looking to learn a bit about Adobe Illustrator. Would this be a good starting point?

Are you trying to convince people to spend less time writing? Ive never disagreed with a comment more than this one

Hmm, not sure if the data in the article is correct. I replaced the battery in my SE 2020, there is no persistent warning, but i can no longer check battery health

I love the teams and share point integration in edge.

I thought the title was mathematically uncouth as well

In 2044 a bulleted list will be considered a deep dive

Never heard of a mathematical error called a bug before

I might try rg, but I have been using either consult-ripgrep or ivy-ripgrep for many years

That’s only 6x more than my 5600x

This is a great tutorial.

The first time I heard somebody say an LLM hallucinated, I knew exactly what they meant, so I think hallucination is a good term.

Yes, companies fire workers sometimes.

I think a common “solution” is to use a Gaussian process model.

Why are tickets priced too low?

Pretty sure emacs lisp compiles to native code now