Another good timewaster is https://7kfans.com/ But you'll probably only enjoy it if you played the original in your youth.
239 karma · joined May 23, 2016
Another good timewaster is https://7kfans.com/ But you'll probably only enjoy it if you played the original in your youth.
E.g. in germany, the price of health care is proportional to income.
I've seen parts that weren't much better then someones lib on github, because essentially that's what boost is.
(I'm aware that at least Chrome does some syntactic checks on the shader syntax)
My mental model of the Web is a human brain with all kinds of weird mechanisms - one that forgets things, makes things up, mixes memories. Google is like an "association cortex" - take it away and all the memories are still there but access to them is much harder and needs to go through more indirections (links).
Some years ago I used an analog TV card tuned to an empty channel that was giving seemingly white noise and captured frames to generate entropy. I only used the least significant bit of each RGB value of each pixel.
When I supplied the bits to the diehard testsuite, it complained about a number of patterns and failing tests.
The hash function will of course save you, but it's hard to tell the amount of real randomness that's coming from the sensor.
update: Oh, I may have misunderstood. If the whole images changes in random ways and is secret, then of course this is fine.
Maybe what I wanted to express was more like this: TP-Link has a sloppy attitude towards the security of their stock firmware. It might work, but it is full of security holes. HTTPS and checksums/signatures wouldn't change that.
Maybe they could do everything right with their firmware and provide top notch security and updates. But then their firmware would be a factor for market differentiation and at that point they would be incentivized to put effective code signing schemes in place. Other market players do that. Look at AVM Fritz Box products - nice hardware, security updates for many years and the result is: they are known GPL offenders and have strong code signing in place.
Instead TP-Link delivers you crap firmware on nice and cheap hardware and they don't care what you run on it.
TP-Link plastic routers have nice cheap hardware and they make it really easy for you to flash it with LEDE/OpenWRT.
that makes it actually a viable alternative to MD5
[...] When using 128-bits, the x86 and x64 versions do not produce the same values [...]
which will make it unsuitable for cross-platform applications. I was talking about a usecase where you could also choose CRC32 from a security standpoint but want more collision resistance. How does blake2 performance compare to MD5?
Or you could use C++ and Qt and suddenly have Windows,Mac and Linux support in one codebase. And the Qt mobile story is looking better with every release.