cleaning

It only needs additional context and work if you are unfamiliar with the concepts underlying it. Possibly consider you are out of your depth here, rather than jumping to conclusions.

Why?

How is this your reaction to the story?

American companies won't even sue other American companies (xai distilling opus), in fact they instead form partnerships ;)

I prefer the casino.

What model are you using? Llama 3.1 8b? This has not been true for years.

I hope I never have to work with you.

Do you have an example of any company ever doing this?

It's primarily used by people who tend to sit on the cutting edge e.g. startups and developers who follow the latest tools. It's not well worn enough to be adopted by slower enterprise environments. Bun is well known within web development but if you don't work in the space and don't keep up to date with modern tooling it's unlikely you would have awareness of it.

It is not "absolutely" something that can lead to injury. Injury itself is difficult to define, and often the reason one experiences pain sensation is multifactorial. Within lifting contexts, generally the factor which has the strongest evidence for injury prediction is how sharply an athlete increases intensity compared to what they have previously adapted to.

No offense, but this post does come across as you only having a surface level understanding of the field. Especially surrounding injury/pain perception, I would be more careful of what you assume is true, there's far more nuance.

As someone who has been very deep down this rabbit hole and hacked together multiple path and velocity trackers over the years (specifically for olympic weightlifting), there is no extra information that tracking bar path will give you that simply looking at the video won't, and often just adds more clutter. You don't need to graph bar path to see that the bar is looping too far forward after hip contact in the snatch.

Velocity on the other hand is a great metric to track and is used as a proxy for RPE. Mike Tuchscherer was the first one to systematize it for powerlifting a while back, if you've been lifting for 20 years you're probably aware of the name.

Probably won't stay that way:

https://x.com/ZPostFacto/status/2050780692062376287

"our"?

In my opinion, the IDE interface still has not been beaten if you are working on a serious codebase where you are reviewing each diff.

Just because it's not discussed much on HN does not imply it is not relevant in the broader space. Cursor is still very much prevalent there with 1 mil DAU.

Most HN commenters seem to be a step behind the latest developments, and sometimes miss them entirely (Kimi K2.5 is one example). Not surprising as most people don't want to put in the effort to sift through the bullshit on Twitter to figure out the latest opinions. Many people here will still prefer the output of Opus 4.5/4.6/4.7, nowadays this mostly comes down to the aesthetic choices Anthropic has made.

No.

Terraria is an infamous example.

If you're only paying $3-5 on Linode then your level of usage would probably be comfortably at $0 on Vercel.

Literally the first featured client on their landing page. Amateurs all the way down.

Wow this is really really bad. Insane this hasn't been fixed yet, media outlets are going to have a fun time with this story

Your post is ambiguous until the second part, FYI. In this conflict, it's a good idea to be clear on which nation you are talking about from the start.

Important to note it's only for participants, not the general public.

After growing up in the USSR but living in the US, the young Americans are correct. The number of choices are an illusion, most paths lead you down the same shit. People don't have the time or energy to dig deep into every option for every purchase.

Reader's note: the author was a member of the CIA for 26 years

You're telling on yourself here

Why do you call it X?

I don't think this is a meaningful distinction. Most people here likely change more than just a 'few settings' and either download one of the debloat tools or generate an autounattend.xml before installing, and some replace the default search with Everything.

Unless you're working in an environment where absolutely no third party tools are allowed, it's expected for someone to spend at least a little bit of time adjusting the workspace to their preferences.

Additionally all of the tools I listed technically have paid plans but they're all free to use, I've never paid for Raycast yet even the free features blow out of the water any desktop management/productivity tooling I've used on Windows or Linux.

The defaults in every OS are set made for power users (i.e. anyone doing more than browsing the web and using office).

With Windows you need to remove most of the cruft, Mac is no different; most people are using some combination of Raycast, Rectangle, Alfred, etc...

Neither does AWS and you can argue they aren't good but they're objectively successful, so it doesn't seem like a good metric.