2,577 karma · joined December 29, 2019
This makes it possible to embed a lot of facts into the encoding vectors of an LLM.
Of course it's fine to ask why something like this project exists if you don't know. But I feel like the discussions tend to outgrow that and end up at "I don't need it so why should anyone care".
I would have expected the relay server only being used for initial handshake to punch through NAT, after which the transfer is P2P. Only in the case of some network restrictions the data really flows through the relay. How could they afford running the free relay otherwise?
To me this sounds like Logic Programming and I immediately think of Prolog. Is it fair to compare them?
During my Master's or PhD I would have agreed with the "slow science" sentiments here. These days I want to get things done and work with collaborators.
No, the relative error aka. std/mean decreases. For Poisson, var=mean=N => std/mean = sqrt(N)/N = 1/sqrt(N). I'm sure the author knows this but the post is not written very clearly imho. I wonder who the target audience is?
When I was a junior researcher I rather found confusing that variance increases with increased counts. But the perceived "error" is the standard deviation relative to mean, which does decrease as shown above.
I have the feeling LabView is a good tool for designing control panels and visual tools in general ("front-end"). It is less suited for implementing back-end algorithms. I guess I wish for a similar tool which can also handle the back-end (in the context of my data processing job).
The problem is that I don't know myself what UI I would actually want for a "canvas-based editor". Some mixture between a visual flowchart and being able to edit code in each box? I'm obviously not the first person to think about it and it seems to be a non-trivial problem.
(maybe not initially, but they emphasize multiple times that you can/should change the cells inside the pack every three years)
Also consider using "None" instead of "np.newaxis". To newcomers it's not as self-explanatory but it results in more readable code imho.
I am not saying this is false, but think about the inverse: are there non-democratic states never drifting into mass surveillance? Maybe it is a symptom of a developed, high-trust society.
Which doesn't make mass surveillance a good thing. I'm just contemplating whether it's even possible to turn out different.
FWIW, I think you mean `dd`.