2,131 karma · joined March 19, 2024
Now the problem is that if someone puts a $10/month price on the AI functionality, they will stop paying for it because it doesn't really have a $10/month ROI.
Literally every AI thing I've seen people use has got an interest taper off way before the free trial even ends.
The constraining factor will prevent an energy apocalypse: It doesn't materially improve most people's lives at all.
Companies House is already a large graph of companies and ownerships. You can do this with naive methods easier.
Yeah you're not going to run top end games at 4k on them but most people don't do that either. And the market for optimising them towards the large market scope makes sense.
Example of what is already on the market and in people's pockets. You can connect a controller and 4k display to it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRAOBEtQ_MY
In a couple of years I bet that has changed.
Did someone get a O365 license reduction or a nice dinner out. MS rep used to take me out to dinner in the 90s to get us to use NT+Visual Basic. Free dinner with asshats - worth it. We used Solaris in the end and Sun only gave us hats.
As for Apple, no. Literally I get asked once about stuff and then never again.
That doesn't make a good headline though.
YMMV but some people are crazy. The EPA is however not. But what the EPA say and what the woman claims are disparate.
Edit: to be clear I'd expect the EPA to install independently maintained monitoring equipment which is not subject to the bias of Apple or the reporter. Then collect more data!
Well that explains the entire data visualisation and dashboard consultancy nicely.
How does anyone rationalise the information they have if they don’t make an effort to understand it. Or how can they even select a visualisation method or comparison method. We are truly fucked!
If it's a bad plot, perhaps some introspection is required...
I'm not one to appeal to authority either which is why I am making objective arguments about what is presented.
And yes he should go on a stats course. I dread to think the chaos he’s spread to people who don’t know better.
Just because you’re high profile in the data viz industry doesn’t mean you should be commenting on statistics especially with such a clear misunderstanding going on.
Some of us are definitely more qualified to speak on these matters and we still don’t think we’re qualified to teach it.